When the gospel takes effect on any of the heathen, although it is certain that they never had the opportunity
of learning anything of this kind from others, yet we find them expressing the same feelings which are common to other
Christians. Persons from different quarters of the globe, whose native tongue is entirely different, yet speak the same
language in religion.
The late eminently pious and learned theologian, the Rev Dr Livingston, related to me, not many years
before his decease, a pleasant story which will serve to illustrate the point under consideration, and which I communicate
to the public the more willingly because I do not know that he has left any record of it behind him. While a student at
the University of Utrecht, a number of pious persons, from the town and from among the students, were accustomed to meet
for free conversation on experimental religion and for prayer and praise in a social capacity. On one of these occasions,
when the similarity of the exercises of the pious, in all countries and ages, was the subject of conversation, it was remarked
by one of the company that there was then present a representative from each of the four quarters of the world. These were
Dr Livingston from America, a young man from the Cape of Good Hope in Africa, another student from one of the Dutch possessions
in the East Indies, and many natives of Europe of course. It was therefore proposed that, at the next meeting, the three
young gentlemen first referred to, together with an eminently pious young nobleman of Holland, should each give a particular
narrative of the rise and progress of the work of grace in his own soul.
The proposal was universally acceptable, and accordingly a narrative was heard from a native of each of
the four quarters of the globe – of their views and feelings, of their trials and temptations etc. The result was highly
gratifying to all present, and I think Dr Livingston said that it was generally admitted by those present that they had
never before witnessed so interesting a scene. And, since I have taken the liberty of mentioning the name of that distinguished
theologian, I beg leave to add that I have never seen a man who appeared to love vital piety more, or to understand its
nature better.
But the identity of religious feeling which has been described above is consistent with a great variety
in many of the accompanying circumstances. Indeed, it seems probable that each individual Christian has something distinctly
characteristic in his own case, so that there exists at least as much difference in the peculiar features of the inner
as of the outward man. The causes of these differences are manifold. As first, the different degrees of grace received
in the commencement of the divine life; secondly, the extent to which they have respectively run in sin, and the suddenness,
or gradual nature, of their change; thirdly, the degree of religious knowledge which is possessed; and finally, no small
diversity arises from the various constitutional temperaments of different persons, which must have a powerful effect in
giving complexion to the exercises of religion. To all which may be added the manner in which persons under religious impressions
are treated by their spiritual guides, and especially the manner in which the gospel is preached to them.
It has been remarked by men of exact observation that particular revivals of religion are often marked
by something peculiar in the exercises and in the spirit of those who are the subjects of them. In some revivals, convictions
are more sharp and awful, or continued for a longer time, than in others; and the converts, in some revivals, appear to
acquire a much deeper and more abiding impression of the reality and glory of divine things, and are evidently more under
the constraining influence of the love of Christ, than is observable in other cases. These are subjects which deserve a
careful investigation, and as revivals are increasing in frequency and extent in our churches, and as different modes of
conducting them are in use, it is highly important that some man of deep experience and sober, impartial judgement should
make observations extensively, and communicate them to the religious public, which is, in many places, perplexed and distracted
with the different methods of treatment recommended by different persons and different parties.
It may, however, be laid down as a sound rule that, in proportion as the truth of God is clearly brought
to view and faithfully applied to the heart and conscience, the good effects will be manifest. Erroneous opinions, although
mingled with the essential truths of the gospel, will ever tend to mar the work of God. The good produced on any individual,
or on a society, must not be judged of by the violence of the feelings excited, but by their character. Men may be consumed
by a fiery zeal, and yet exhibit little of the meekness, humility, and sweet benevolence of Jesus. Great pretenders and
high professors may be proud, arrogant, and critical. When these are the effects, we may, without fear, declare, that they "know
not what manner of spirit [they] are of". Any religion, however corrupt, may have its zealots; but true Christianity
consists in the fruits of the Spirit, which are "love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness,
temperance".
Piety seems also to assume an aspect somewhat different in different ages and periods of the church. There
is in human nature a strong tendency to run to extremes, and from one extreme immediately to the opposite. And as the imperfections
of our nature mingle with everything which we touch, so piety itself is not exempt from the influence of the tendency above
mentioned. In one age, or in one religious community, the leaning is to enthusiasm; in another, to superstition. At one
time, religion is made to assume a severe and gloomy aspect; the conscience is gloomy and things indifferent are viewed
as sins; and human infirmities are magnified into crimes. At such times, all cheerfulness is proscribed; and the Christian
whom nature prompts to smile, feels a check from the conscience within. This value of genuine piety is also often connected
with an unreasonable attitude. Now, when true religion is disfigured by such defects, it appears before the world to great
disadvantage. Men of the world form their opinions of the nature of piety from what they observe in its professors, and
from such an exhibition of it as we have described they often take up prejudices which are never removed.
There is, however, an opposite extreme, not less dangerous and injurious than this, when professors of
religion conform to the world so far that no clear distinction can be observed between the Christian and the worldling.
If the former error drives men away from religion as a sour and miserable thing, this leads them to the opinion that Christians
are activated by the same principles as they are, and therefore they conclude that no great change of their character is
necessary. It is sometimes alleged, by professors of religion, who thus accommodate themselves to the fashions and amusements
of the world, that they hope by this means to render religion attractive and thus gain over to piety those who neglect
it; but this is a weak pretext, for such conformity always tends to confirm people in their carelessness. When they see
such professors at the theatre, or figuring in the ball-room, their conclusion either is, that there is no reality in vital
piety, or that these professors act inconsistently.
The religious habits of some serious professors of religion are apt to make a very unfavourable impression
on the minds of sensible men. They assume a false piety and speak in an affected and drawling tone, often sighing and giving
audible utterance to their own emotions. Now these persons may be and, I doubt not, often are, truly pious; but the impression
made on most minds, by this affectation of religious solemnity, is that they are hypocrites who aim at being thought uncommonly
devout. It appears to me that religion never appears so lovely as when she wears the dress of perfect simplicity. We ought
not, indeed, to be ashamed of our religion before the world, but it obliges us to be very careful not to give to others
an unfavourable opinion of serious piety. The rule is, "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your
good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven". "Let not your good be evil spoken of."