The Jubilee (1)
A Sermon by Robert Gordon
Leviticus 25:8-12. And thou shalt number seven sabbaths of years unto thee,
seven times seven years; and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall
be unto thee forty and nine years. Then shalt thou cause the trumpet of the
jubilee to sound on the tenth day of the seventh month, in the day of atonement
shall ye make the trumpet sound throughout all your land. And ye shall hallow
the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all
the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you; and ye shall return
every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.
A jubilee shall that fiftieth year be unto you: ye shall not sow, neither
reap that which groweth of itself in it, nor gather the grapes in it of thy
vine undressed. For it is the jubilee; it shall be holy unto you: ye shall
eat the increase thereof out of the field.
The Jubilee is an institution full of instruction, considered simply in reference
to the immediate purposes which it was designed to serve for Israel. The most
obvious of these purposes was to instill in them a habitual recognition of their
dependence on God, and of His sovereign, inalienable right to bestow upon them
possessions on any terms, and to dispose of these possessions in any way that
seemed good to Himself. If it led them so to recognise His supremacy and absolute
propriety in all they had, the effect would be a life of faith on His Word, because
they must feel that they had nothing on which they could reckon for the permanency
of their possessions but His promise. And this life of faith would be a life
of obedience, because they could have no confidence in the fulfilment of God's
promise unless they acquiesced in the terms on which that promise was given.It
was not the only ordinance of the Mosaic economy which had for its object the
same effect, though it was perhaps the most remarkable. We read of three great
feasts, or festivals: the Passover, Pentecost, and the Feast of Tabernacles,
at each of which all the males of Israel were required to appear before the Lord
God, in the place where He should put His name. At first sight, there may appear
to have been no other difficulty in complying with this command than the inconvenience
in undertaking a long and perhaps very fatiguing journey. But after the establishment
of Israel in Canaan, they were surrounded by powerful and inveterate enemies,
and large, warlike bodies of the original inhabitants of the land dwelt in the
very midst of them, eager to take any opportunity of wreaking their vengeance
on those who had forcibly - and as they no doubt thought, unjustly - taken possession
of their country. We cannot then fail to perceive that it was a very perilous
thing for them to leave their wives and children, their sick brethren, their
aged and infirm parents, not to speak of their flocks and herds and all their
worldly substance exposed defenceless to the assaults of powerful enemies.
Yet the command was imperative that all the males who were able - all who
could defend their homes from the inroad of bitter and revengeful enemies -
should leave their homes unprotected, receiving, however, this security from
the Lord Himself: "Neither shall any man desire thy land, when thou shalt go
up to appear before the Lord thy God thrice in the year". No doubt this was
ample security, the pledged promise of Him who is the Supreme Ruler in heaven
and on the earth beneath, and exercises a most holy, wise and powerful control
over all His creatures and all their actions. But it could awaken no feeling
of security in the minds of the people except as they believed it. No outward
provision was made for the protection of the families and flocks of those who
went to present themselves before the Lord. God said He would so control the
hearts of the enemies of Israel that they would not desire the land in the
absence of those who could resist them. But they were required implicitly to
rely on this promise, believing that an agency unseen by mortal eye would lay
a restraint on the adversaries who would otherwise have laid waste their land.
So peremptorily were the people of God in the old time required to rely exclusively
on His simple word, or, in the emphatic language of the apostle, to "walk by
faith, not by sight".
And so, in like manner, were they required to act by another ordinance, recorded
in Exodus 23, and repeated in the preceding context: "When ye come into the
land which I give you, then shall the land keep a sabbath unto the Lord. Six
years thou shalt sow thy field . . . but in the seventh year shall be a sabbath
of rest unto the land, a sabbath for the Lord: thou shalt neither sow thy field,
nor prune thy vineyard". At first sight perhaps, this commandment might be
even more startling to the people, for they could hardly fail to inquire how
they were to subsist during the seventh year if they were neither to sow their
field nor prune their vineyard. Accordingly God was graciously pleased to anticipate
this fear and give them an assurance which, if they implicitly believed it,
would effectually remove that fear: "If ye shall say, What shall we eat the
seventh year? Behold, we shall not sow, nor gather in our increase; then I
will command my blessing upon you in the sixth year, and it shall bring forth
fruit for three years."
This was indeed a very large promise, absolutely securing to them much more
than was actually necessary for supplying the absence of the seventh year's
produce. But it could remove their fears only as they believed it, and they
were thus required to rely exclusively on the divine faithfulness for a supply
which no efforts of their own could have secured, and for which they saw no
outward provision. No doubt, when the sixth year arrived and they saw their
fields bringing forth as it were by handfuls, they would feel relieved by such
a clear proof of God's faithfulness, and would thus be prepared for leaving
their land unsown during the seventh year, without the dread of famine or of
scarcity. In this respect, the trial of their faith regarding the rest of their
land during the seventh year, might not be so severe as in their being required
to leave their homes thrice a year without any visible security for the protection
of those whom they left behind, and no security at all but the simple promise: "Neither
shall any man desire thy land, when thou shalt go up to appear before the Lord
thy God thrice in the year".
But though they had thus a clear proof of the fulfilment of God's promise
before they must leave their land untilled, yet that promise had a great deal
to contend with in the carnal desires and unbelieving suggestions of a corrupt
heart, as the promises of God still have. Though they had ample means of subsistence,
their covetousness might prompt the question, What necessity is there for such
a sacrifice? In this spirit they might gradually encroach on the commandment,
and believe that they would be possessed of greater abundance by disregarding
it. And they did come so to reason and to act, for the violation of this ordinance
was expressly assigned as one of the main causes of the terrible judgement
which overtook them when they were carried into captivity, so that "the land
rested and enjoyed her sabbaths", "because it did not rest in their sabbaths,
when they dwelt upon it."
Whatever the people of Israel might make of the ordinance, it befitted the
sovereignty of God, as the proprietor of all things in heaven and on earth,
thus to require from them a distinct recognition of His supremacy, and of their
dependence. But it was also a very gracious appointment, fitted to keep alive
in their minds a grateful recollection of all the wonderful works He had done
on their behalf, and to furnish them with a permanent proof of His unceasing
watchfulness over them. And if they had thus lived by faith on the simple word
of God, in opposition to the carnal reasonings of their unbelieving hearts,
what a glorious testimony would they have borne in the sight of the heathen
to the sovereignty, power and faithfulness of the only living and true God.
And how truly might they have said, "What nation is there so great, who hath
God so nigh unto them, as the Lord our God is in all things that we call upon
Him for?"
These remarks are equally applicable to the Jubilee. This, being itself a
seventh or sabbatical year, was of course subject to all the regulations of
that institution. During that year they were not to sow, nor reap, nor gather
the grapes of their vineyard. Whatever the land produced of itself might be
used by any one who found it in the field. But, in addition, the Jubilee was
to be introduced with the sound of the trumpet throughout the land; liberty
was to be proclaimed to all slaves and prisoners, and all estates which had
been sold, or otherwise alienated, were to be restored to their former owners
or to the survivors of the families to which they originally belonged.
Such an ordinance as this would never have been adopted by Israel or any other
people of their own accord, as it was in various ways opposed to the selfishness
of human nature. It must have been peculiarly offensive to those whose influence
was greatest - ungodly men who had accumulated great possessions. We have abundant
evidence of this in the history of Israel in the days of their degeneracy.
Considered as an assertion of God's sovereignty over Israel, His exclusive
claim to their service, and His absolute right of propriety in the land He
had given them, nothing could be better fitted than the Jubilee to keep them
in mind of what they were too prone to forget: that they had no right to any
portion of Canaan but on such terms as God in His sovereign good pleasure might
see fit to allot to them. Such was the reason He Himself assigned for the regulation
by which estates were to return to their original possessors in the year of
jubilee: "The land shall not be sold for ever; for the land is mine; for ye
are strangers, and sojourners with me".
Nor was the institution more befitting the divine majesty than it was gracious
towards Israel; for what could be more conducive to their true happiness than
an ordinance which provided for their living together as one great family,
dependent on the same Father, and each having the same security for his portion
- even the immediate grant of the Proprietor of all things? And how high the
honour conferred upon them in exhibiting to the nations around them such a
proof of God's sovereignty, power and faithfulness as no other people had ever
manifested! For, so long as they observed these ordinances - so contrary to
human wisdom - they enjoyed not only internal peace and prosperity, but protection
from foreign foes. Thus, notwithstanding their sabbatical years and years of
jubilee, they required no outside aid to supply their wants. Nor did any man
desire their land when they went to appear before the Lord their God thrice
in the year.
But Israel degenerated from what they were in the time of Joshua; they forgot
the mighty works which God had done for their fathers; and they became weary
of living by faith on God's word as their all-sufficient security. They thought
that their own wisdom could provide more largely for their wants, and that
their own strength could better defend them from their enemies. Adopting the
practices of the nations around them, they thought themselves wiser and safer
by acting as others did, little dreaming that, when they forsook God's ordinances,
their strength also departed from them and they were indeed like other men.
But though they ceased to testify for God, He did not cease to testify by
them to Himself. When they refused to confide in His word, and so glorify Him
by their prosperity, He vindicated His truth in their adversity; for when they
dishonoured His Sabbaths, and refused to the land her seventh year's rest -
and when, in the year of jubilee, they denied to their servants the liberty
which the Lord of their land had solemnly secured to them, then He said to
them by the mouth of His prophet, "Behold, I proclaim a liberty for you, to
the sword, to the pestilence, and to the famine: and I will make you to be
removed into all the kingdoms of the earth".
The institution of the Jubilee was thus fitted to impress Israel with a sense
of their dependence on God, and to inculcate faith in His word as their only
security and the only powerful motive also to cheerful obedience. But it is
plain that another purpose of that ordinance was to give the greatest possible
prominence to the Sabbath. The injunction to keep the Sabbath holy is more
frequently repeated in Scripture than perhaps any other precept - a plain intimation
that men are prone to become specially impatient of it. And the history of
all ages has afforded abundant melancholy evidence that it is so.
Not only was the precept itself frequently repeated, clearly intimating how
essential God saw it for maintaining His fear and worship, He was pleased to
make the institution of the Sabbath the foundation of other institutions, whereby
its value as a privilege, and its binding nature as a law, might be presented
more prominently. The appointment of the seventh year's rest to the land was
first introduced, in Exodus 23, in close connection with the Sabbath command: "Six
years thou shalt sow thy land, and shalt gather in the fruits thereof; but
the seventh year thou shalt let it rest and lie still; that the poor of thy
people may eat" - that is, gather freely of what was produced naturally in
the fields, which would not be little in Canaan, especially with God's blessing; "and
what they leave the beasts of the field shall eat. In like manner shalt thou
deal with thy vineyard, and with thy olive yard." And then is added a renewal
of the Sabbath commandment: "Six days thou shalt do thy work, and on the seventh
day thou shalt rest; that thine ox and thine ass may rest, and the son of thy
handmaid, and the stranger may be refreshed".
But the intended connection between the weekly Sabbath and the seven years'
rest to the land is still more emphatically marked in Leviticus 25, where that
year is expressly called the sabbath of the land: "When ye come into the land
which I give you, then shall the land keep a sabbath unto the Lord. Six years
thou shalt sow thy field, and six years thou shalt prune thy vineyard, and
gather in the fruit thereof; but in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of
rest unto the land, a sabbath for the Lord: thou shalt neither sow thy field,
nor prune thy vineyard." In like manner, the institution of the Jubilee is
expressed in language obviously designed to connect it with the Sabbath. It
is not simply said, Thou shalt number seven times seven, or 49 years, and then
cause the trumpet of the jubilee to sound. The language is: "Thou shalt number
seven sabbaths of years unto thee, seven times seven years; and the space of
the seven sabbaths of years shall be unto thee forty and nine years. Then shalt
thou cause the trumpet of the jubilee to sound." Care was thus taken to connect
the seventh year and the year of jubilee with the Sabbath, as that which gave
them a character of sacredness and solemnity; while in their turn they served
to show very impressively what an important place the Sabbath occupied in the
sight of God.
It is plain that the divine purpose was to set forth that holy day as an emblem
of His rest, and a pledge to His people of their entering into that rest. Nothing
therefore could more clearly disclose the ungodliness and unbelief of the people
of Israel than their profanation of God's holy day, after all that He had said
and done to show them its inestimable value. Accordingly, nothing is more frequently
referred to by the prophets - who were sent to remonstrate with them on their
backsliding - than profaning the sacredness of the Sabbath. "If thou turn away
thy foot from the Sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on My holy day; and call
the Sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable; and shalt honour Him,
not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine
own words; then shalt thou delight thyself in the Lord; and I will cause thee
to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage
of Jacob thy father; for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it".
But although much was done to impress Israel with an abiding sense of the
value of the Sabbath as a pledge of the rest which remaineth for the people
of God, we have in the resurrection of Christ a still greater testimony to
the Lord's day, the Christian Sabbath, as a precious privilege. We no longer
need a sabbatical year or a jubilee to remind us of that privilege, for what
could give sacredness and value to that day in our estimation, if Christ's
rising from the dead and entering into His rest did not do so?
But the Jubilee may suggest very solemn reflections. Had that ordinance been
still in force, many among us would have witnessed it, having lived for seven
times seven years. Therefore many of us have spent Sabbaths which amount to
seven years. Have these been the happiest and most highly-valued years of our
life? If we now had a jubilee to celebrate, would it be one of our subjects
of thanksgiving that we had been favoured with so many seasons of repose from
the toil of this sinful state and been refreshed by a foretaste of that rest
which remaineth for the people of God? Perhaps none of us can seriously entertain
this question without feeling that we have reason to mourn, for we have grievously
come short of honouring that holy season as we ought. But is there not reason
to fear that multitudes would be disposed to reply: Seven years of Sabbaths!
What a waste of time and loss of productive labour to the community! Perhaps
few would have the hardihood to express this sentiment in so many words. But
I fear that many are secretly now saying with backsliding Israel of old, "When
will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn; and the Sabbath, that we
may set forth wheat?"
But the passage we are considering was also designed to typify the preaching
of the gospel, the proclamation of the glad tidings of an almighty Saviour,
and a full, free remission of the penalty of sin and emancipation from its
power. The trumpet of the jubilee was sounded on the day of atonement, that
great day on which the high priest entered the holy of holies, when rites were
observed which more clearly prefigured Christ's death than any of the other
types by which He was presented to the faith of the Old Testament Church. We
therefore cannot avoid seeing in the institution of the Jubilee a very lively
representation of what followed the resurrection and ascension of Christ, when,
as the high priest of His Church, He entered into heaven, there to appear in
the presence of God for them.
But we have the authority of Scripture for thus connecting these two things
as type and antitype, for it was in obvious allusion to the Jubilee that Christ,
by the mouth of His prophet, thus spoke: "The Spirit of the Lord God is upon
Me; because the Lord hath anointed Me to preach good tidings unto the meek;
He hath sent Me to bind up the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives,
and the opening of the prison to them that are bound; to proclaim the acceptable
year of the Lord". Most literally was this fulfilled, not only by Christ Himself
during His public ministry, but when, after His resurrection, His disciples
went into all the world and preached to every creature the gospel, even the
glad tidings of liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them
that were bound - and when, after His ascension, He poured out His Holy Spirit
upon them, qualifying them to make this proclamation to men of every tongue
and country and kindred.
Nor was there merely an external resemblance between the proclamation of the
Jubilee and the preaching of the gospel, the one being universal in Israel,
the other universal in the world at large. They resembled each other also in
the essence of what they proclaimed, for never was freedom more fully announced
to the bondmen of Israel than spiritual liberty is now proclaimed by the gospel
to every sinner. It is true that the gospel proclaims a spiritual emancipation,
and men, being naturally insensible to the evils of spiritual bondage, may
receive the announcement of deliverance with very different feelings from those
with which bondmen in Israel heard the trumpet of the Jubilee. But men's reception
of the gospel does not alter its nature. It is essentially an unconditional
proclamation of "liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to
them that are bound". To the weary and heavy-laden soul that so receives it,
it will bring a far more glorious deliverance than any prisoner experienced
on being delivered from earthly bondage.
We now live under a perpetual jubilee, under the unceasing sound of that trumpet
which proclaims glad tidings of great joy - glory to God in the highest, peace
on earth, and good will towards men - for no sinner listens to this blessed
Book without being personally commanded to "believe the record that God gave
of His Son", "that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in His
Son". And to those who have believed the glad tidings of the gospel - who have
been delivered from a sense of unforgiven guilt and the dread of coming wrath,
and have tasted the blessedness of that liberty wherewith Christ makes His
people free - the passage before us can hardly fail to suggest the thought
of a still more glorious jubilee, when the release of their bodies from the
prison-house of the grave shall be proclaimed, when the trumpet shall sound
and this corruptible shall put on incorruption, and this mortal shall put on
immortality, and "then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written,
Death is swallowed up in victory".
In the prospect of that day, there may sometimes be more of solemn awe than
joyful anticipation, for it is a solemn thought that "the Lord Jesus shall
be revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance
on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ," that
all who sleep in the dust shall hear His voice and come forth and stand at
His judgement seat. But faith should realise that the Judge is the compassionate
Saviour on whom we have been taught to rely. If, by faith, we are familiar
in thought with the glory of His second coming, that event will become more
and more the subject of joyful hope, a source of consolation amidst all our
present trials. So it is intended to be, as the Scriptures plainly testify,
for it was to comfort suffering Christians that we find the apostle so frequently
alluding to the glories of the resurrection day. "For the Lord Himself shall
descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with
the trump of God; and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are
alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet
the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort
one another with these words."
Endnotes:
1. Reprinted with abridgement from Christ in the Old
Testament, vol 2. Free Presbyterian Publications are considering republishing
this four-volume set. Gordon (1786-1853) was latterly minister of the Free
High Church in Edinburgh and one of the most prominent preachers of his time.
It was under his ministry that Alexander Moody Stuart was converted.
|