The Claudy Cover-up
Claudy is the village in County Londonderry where, without
warning, the IRA detonated three car-bombs on 31 July 1972, resulting in
the deaths of nine people. This became the "forgotten atrocity", and we now
know why it did not receive the publicity given to similar incidents over
the years of terrorist activity. The shameful cover-up would have been exposed
if investigative journalists had shown more interest in discovering the perpetrators
of this murderous attack. Now, with the release of the relevant Government
papers under the 30-year rule, it is revealed that a Roman Catholic priest,
who was also a member of the IRA, was known at the time to have played a
prominent role in its planning and execution. Yet he was neither arrested,
questioned nor charged!
Why? Because William Whitelaw, then Secretary of State for
Northern Ireland, and Cardinal Conway, then head of the Roman Catholic Church
in Ireland, agreed to cover up his involvement. It was expedient for both
of them to act in this manner but their conduct was, by any righteous standard,
deceitful, immoral and infamous. Conway transferred his priest across the
border and Whitelaw proceeded to carry out his further duties of office,
presumably without a qualm of conscience, and at the end of the day, he was
rewarded with a Viscountship! Both of them have now entered eternity - as
has also the priest who had blood on his hands - to hand in their account
to Him who judges righteously. None of them lived long enough in this world
to see their conduct exposed, and more will no doubt be revealed if the call
for a judicial inquiry is, as we hope, heeded.
The greatest and final exposure lies ahead. "Reason", wrote
Robert Shaw, "infers a future judgment from the state of things in this world.
Here we take for granted these two fundamental principles of religion - the
being of God, and His providence in the government of the world. All who
acknowledge these truths must, and do, believe that God is infinitely just
and righteous, infinitely wise and holy, infinitely good and merciful; and
that he cannot be otherwise. From this it necessarily results that it must
be well with the righteous and ill with the wicked. But the most superficial
view of the present state of things is sufficient to convince us that God
does not, in this world, dispense prosperity only to the good and adversity
only to the evil: 'There be just men, unto whom it happeneth according to
the work of the wicked; again, there be wicked men, to whom it happeneth
according to the work of the righteous'. The promiscuous dispensations of
providence have perplexed the minds of men in every age, and tried the faith
of the children of God. But reason rightly exercised would lead us to the
conclusion that, upon the supposition of the being and providence of God,
there must be a day coming when these things will be brought under review,
and when a wide and visible difference shall be made between him that serveth
God and him that serveth Him not."
JM