Rabbi Duncan (1)
Alexander Moody Stuart
John Duncan was born in Aberdeen in 1796. He was a delicate, dreamy, clever,
engaging, affectionate, high-spirited and occasionally passionate boy, sometimes
crying bitterly under the severity of paternal discipline, sometimes abruptly
laughing aloud at the brightness, or at the humour, of his own hidden thoughts.
His father, who was of strict religious principles and a member of the Secession
Church, was by trade a shoemaker. Meaning to bring up his son in his own calling,
he set him on a stool beside himself. But manual labour was very irksome to
the boy; and his father, whose character was extremely stern, had little patience
for his blundering work, and no pleasantry to make shoemaking attractive. After
a time, through his mother's intercession, he was released from this bondage
and to his great joy was sent to the grammar school. From there he worked his
way to the university, where he supported himself, with a hard struggle, by
teaching.
In his college course he seems to have had the characteristics of his later
years. He acquired great fluency in writing Latin, yet did not distinguish
himself in the regular work of the classes, although he laboured hard in his
own fitful way in languages, literature and philosophy. His insatiable love
for languages grew side by side with an intense delight in philosophical speculation,
into which he threw himself with an ardour that would recognise no barriers
in heaven or earth. The ground of revelation was lost; he sank down, through
unbelief, deism and pantheism, into material atheism. Man was in his eyes a
mere animal, like the other beasts, living only to go through the degrading
sameness of the daily round of nature's wants and supplies, "born to eat and
to drink and to digest and to die". Atheism did not have the effect on him
of exciting pride in man's greatness. On the contrary, he was deeply mortified
at his own littleness and the littleness of all humanity, for man without God
and without immortality presented to him nothing to interest, to admire, to
respect, or to love.
His inward history is inseparable from his outward life, both on account of
its singular character, and because he was remarkably communicative about those
unseen personal transactions, on which most men are apt to be reserved. Along
with deep abstraction, he had an irrepressible love of conversation, which
often took the form of asking prayer for relief when in doubt about his own
salvation, but sometimes also of narrating the facts of his past life. Chief
among these were three outstanding events: his deliverance from atheism, his
conversion, and his recovery out of spiritual declension.
His recovery out of atheism he ascribed, in the first instance, to Dr Mearns,
whose cogent reasonings in his lectures, along with his prayers to the "Great
King", convinced him of the existence of God. But the conviction had been reached
by a logical process without any more direct mental perception, and the full
breaking in of the light on this first of all truths he looked back upon to
the last as a great era in his life. "I first saw clearly the existence of
God," he said, "in walking along the bridge at Aberdeen. It was a great discovery
to me, and I stood in an ecstasy of joy." But, while he could now "thank God
for His existence", this measure of light wrought no abiding change on his
heart or life, and he accepted of licence to preach the gospel while practically
a Socinian, (2) though nominally a Sabellian (3),
and with nothing, either in his character or his views, consistent with the
high calling on which he was entering.
The next great event, after eight intellectually-fruitful but spiritually-barren
years, was meeting with Dr Malan of Geneva, who visited Aberdeen in 1826 and
pressed him closely with salvation freely given and to be instantly accepted.
Towards the close of their conversation, Mr Duncan quoted a text of Scripture
which Dr Malan instantly seized, and said, "Man, you have got the Word of God
in your mouth". To this he replied, "And may He not take it utterly out of
my mouth!" He frequently spoke with deep impression of the electric power which
in that moment accompanied the word that was at once in the heart of God and
in his own heart, and he regarded it as the great beginning of all communion
between God and himself in time and in eternity. This turning event in his
life was followed by liberty and light and joy in his own spirit, and holy
boldness in testifying of free grace both in preaching and in conversation.
His third great inward event was the recovery of his soul out of declension
after a year or two had passed and he had lost the fervour of his first love.
Through an exclusive adherence to promise and privilege and peace, apart from
repentance, self-scrutiny and watchfulness, his love and joy had lost their
freshness, and all the fruits of the Spirit had withered. His words were the
same as before, the doctrinal assurance remained, and the profession was as
high as ever; but the reality and power were gone, the lips and the heart were
not one. He could not endure this hollowness. "I am not a hypocrite," he said, "and
I won't be one." He let go the "name to live" that he might recover the life
itself, and he fell into darkness, doubt, fear - all but absolute despair.
Through a conflict very protracted and at length severe, with a deep submission
to the sovereign will of God, he was restored to a good measure of light and
liberty.
After his conversion he was never troubled with doubts about the Word of God,
although he said that he was naturally of a sceptical turn of mind, but that
his scepticism now took the form of doubt about his own salvation. His conversion
and his recovery embraced the two extremes of spiritual exercise, and they
formed the man in his long subsequent life. Each was the complement of the
other; the two combined introduced him into a marvellous fullness of the Word
of God, which he cordially received in its length and in its breadth as few
men have ever done. Throughout his life, his anger burned against a surface
gospel that did not grapple with the conscience, but it kindled as keenly against
the gospel withheld or robbed of its simplicity. "The best preaching is, " he
said, "Believe on Jesus Christ, and keep the Ten Commandments."
In the earlier part of his course, and indeed throughout his life, his own
preaching at its best was of a very high order. At its worst it was scarcely
possible for him to speak without uttering weighty truths in an original and
memorable form. His reading of the Bible was singularly instructive and impressive,
and his prayers were the words of one standing in the immediate presence of
the great Jehovah. But his preaching was too abstract, and was sometimes the
slow utterance of thoughts that seemed to be gathering themselves in drops
while he was in the pulpit - big drops, but with great intervals between them,
and the whole occupying an excessive time before he could be satisfied that
there was enough in the cup to offer to a thirsting soul. But at other times
his whole discourse was as a continuous flow of heavenly eloquence, in which
both the intellect and the spirit soared in so lofty a region that the body
itself seemed to partake of the elevation. On such occasions his language was
concise, oracular and singularly beautiful; every word was a thought sought
out as a jewel and artistically fitted in its place. His discourse was not
one idea presented in many forms, nor many ideas fitted up with looser materials,
nor a chain of successive arguments, but a unity made up of parts, each fine
in itself and each helpful to the whole, fitted together as in a beautiful
mosaic and lighted up with the frequent flashes of sanctified genius. In beauty
it was a picture, but in power it was the rushing of sparkling wine that had
burst its bottles.
In 1830 Mr Duncan was appointed, but without ordination, to the very rural
charge of Persie Chapel, in the eastern borders of Perthshire. On the brief
period of his pastoral duty there, he always looked back with special interest,
and a deep mutual attachment was formed between himself and the people of the
district, who highly appreciated his ministry. His tenderness and the strength
of his affection tempered his faithfulness, which at that time was occasionally
characterised by a severity which would otherwise have given offence. In 1831
he was called to a Sabbath lectureship in Glasgow, where he was afterwards
ordained as minister of Milton Church, and where, in 1837, he married Miss
Gaven, of Aberdeen, who died after two years, to his great grief. While there
he received from Aberdeen the degree of LLD in acknowledgment of his Hebrew
and Oriental learning, in which he had few equals; but by a strange omission
none of the Universities enrolled him among their Doctors in Divinity, although
beside him most other men seemed scarcely to be theologians.
In 1841 Dr Duncan was appointed as a missionary to the Jews in the beautiful
city of Budapest, on the Danube, where the Archduchess of Hungary had been
long praying for the help of a man of God. Before leaving Scotland, he had
been married again, to a widow, Mrs Torrance, who entered with great energy
and wisdom into all his missionary work. His work in Hungary was in all respects
one of the happiest and most fruitful portions of his life. His intimate acquaintance
with their sacred language and their literature excited an interest in the
Jews and rendered them unusually accessible. The spiritual power that rested
on himself was divinely used for their religious awakening, and there was abiding
fruit in some remarkable conversions. At the same time he was greatly honoured
and beloved by the leading Protestant ministers, and his memory is cherished
with a singular affection by pastors of the Reformed Hungarian Church. At a
later period he took a similar interest in the Protestant Churches of Bohemia,
and nothing could exceed the gratitude and attachment of the Bohemian pastors
toward him.
In the ever-memorable era of 1843, Dr Duncan, with all his mind and heart,
cast in his lot with the Free Church of Scotland, along with all the missionaries
to the Jews from the Church of Scotland, for the character of the grand event
of that time was not mainly ecclesiastical, but deeply religious. He was then
recalled to fill the Hebrew Chair in the New College, Edinburgh, and he occupied
this position till his death in 1870.
In genius, in learning and in devotion, Dr Duncan was one of the most remarkable
men of the Disruption. His knowledge of languages was so great that Dr Guthrie
spoke of him in the General Assembly as "the man who could talk his way to
the wall of China". But he knew languages better than he could use them, and
he said himself that English and Latin were the only tongues in which he could
speak with fluency. His irregularity of habit, his mental abstraction, and
his weakness of will in ordinary life, made him in many things of less service
than inferior men. But his wonderful insight into divine things, his fruitful
thoughts clothed with light and beauty, his acute, brilliant, aphoristic sayings,
his deep devoutness, his tenderness of conscience, his transparency, his humility,
his continual repentance toward God, and his ardent love to the Lord Jesus
Christ, have left priceless impressions that can never be erased from the hearts
of his hearers, his students and his friends. His own words form the best memorial
of his character: "Methought I heard the song of one to whom much had been
forgiven, and who therefore loved much; but it was the song of the chief of
sinners, of one to whom most had been forgiven, and who therefore loved most.
I would know, O God, what soul that is. O God, let that soul be mine!"
Endnotes:
1. Reprinted from Disruption Worthies. The standard
biography is David Brown's The Life of Rabbi Duncan, reprinted by Free
Presbyterian Publications (special offer of £4.90 from the Free Presbyterian
Bookroom, reduced from £6.95). Moody Stuart wrote Recollections of John
Duncan, reprinted by the Banner of Truth Trust as The Life of John Duncan (£8.25).
Also reprinted by Free Presbyterian Publications is the fine volume of sermons
and addresses, Rich Gleanings from Rabbi Duncan.
2. Socinians rejected the divinity of Christ and His atonement.
3. Sabellians denied the distinction of persons within
the Trinity.
|