The Reformed Doctrine of Inspiration (1)
1. What It Is
Rev H M Cartwright
The title refers to the inspiration of the Bible, the holy book from which the Christian faith is derived and in which
it is expounded. The Reformed doctrine of inspiration explains how we are justified in regarding the Bible in its entirety
as the Word of God, so that we can be sure that, wherever we turn in this book, God is speaking to us.
1. Why is this teaching described as the Reformed Doctrine of Inspiration? By the Reformed doctrine
is meant the doctrine of the Churches of the Reformation, particularly the doctrine of the Reformed Churches found, for
example, in our Westminster Confession of Faith and other Confessions related to it. The term Reformed distinguishes
this doctrine from that of Romanism and from those of what may for convenience be called liberal Protestantism and liberal
Evangelicalism. We claim that the Bible's own doctrine concerning its inspiration is found in the Reformed statements and
not in Romanism, liberal Protestantism or liberal Evangelicalism.
It may be alleged that the credal statements of Romanism teach the inspiration of the Bible, with whatever measure of
ambiguity the Council of Trent dealt with the subject. But as in the case of other doctrines held by Romanism, the truth
is perverted and effectively denied by the error associated with it. The definitive place given to the Roman Church and
to tradition, even if it were confined to an alleged interpretation of Scripture, denies in effect the unique authority,
clarity and sufficiency belonging to Scripture in virtue of the fact that it alone is the inspired Word of God.
A variety of views may be found in liberal Protestantism and Evangelicalism. Some deny completely any divine revelation
or inspiration - the Bible is just a record of some men's search for God or the ultimate reality. Others admit that God
revealed himself to chosen men but claim that He left them to communicate that revelation, or the fruit of their reflection
on it, as best they could themselves. Others allow for varying degrees of inspiration, some suggesting that parts of the
Bible are inspired by God and other parts are the products of the research or reflection of the writers. Some distinguish
between the Word of God and the Bible and claim that the Bible is not the Word of God, though it may testify to the Word
of God and things written in the Bible can become the Word of God to readers - there may be a kind of "inspiration" for
the reader though not for the writer.
People holding some of these views may subscribe to the formula that the Word of God is contained in the Scriptures,
meaning that it can be found there along with other elements which are not the Word of God. It is clear from the teaching
of the Westminster Divines that, when the Westminster Shorter Catechism (answer 2) uses the expression "the Word
of God, which is contained in the scriptures of the Old and New Testaments", it means that only in the inspired Scriptures
can we hear the infallible word of God - that it is not found in the Apocrypha or tradition of the Romanist, in the inner
voice of the mystic or in any extra-biblical "revelation". In all of these cases man sits in judgement on the Bible; and
what, if anything, is the Word of God is determined either by the "infallible" Church, the critical scholar or the inward
consciousness of the reader.
The Reformed doctrine of inspiration is in keeping with the whole scheme of Reformed doctrine, which is centred upon God,
who is "a Spirit, infinite, eternal and unchangeable in His being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness and truth" (2) -
whose sovereignty finds expression in the revelation of Himself as a God of mercy to His people. God not only purposed
their redemption but has done everything necessary for its accomplishment and application. This includes providing the
infallible Word through which, by regeneration and the teaching of His Holy Spirit, they come to know Him and the truth
concerning Him. The inspiration of men to record infallibly the revelation of God's grace is as much a fact in the scheme
of redemption as any other revealed fact. Like every other fact in the scheme of redemption it emphasises that salvation
is of the Lord, that the initiative and the power in every aspect of salvation belong to Him. The doctrine of inspiration
fits in with the supernatural, God-centred character of the Reformed Faith. It is perhaps significant that, as a matter
of historical fact, it was within the Reformed, or Calvinistic, wing of the Reformation Church, rather than the Lutheran,
that prominence was given to Scripture alone "as an objective standard of truth and source of authority". (3)
2. What is the Reformed Doctrine of Inspiration? Two closely related but separate works of God must be noted
at this point - revelation and inspiration. We are dependent upon God's revelation of Himself for all the knowledge
we have of God. And we are dependent upon God's inspiration of the writers of Scripture for the infallible and
unerring communication of that revelation to us. James Bannerman summed up the relation between revelation and inspiration: "A
supernatural communication of truth from God is a revelation; the supernatural transference of the truth to the
spoken or written word is inspiration". (4)
God can only be known in so far as He reveals Himself. Man cannot find out God by his own searching. Revelation of
God's goodness, wisdom and power, sufficient to leave man without excuse, has been given in the light of nature and in
the works of creation and providence, but that revelation is not sufficient to give the knowledge of God and of His will
which is necessary for salvation. If men are to know God as Saviour, it is necessary that He make Himself known. God made
known to chosen men what He intended to reveal of Himself. (5)
Inspiration is God's method of ensuring that those, to whom He revealed Himself and the mystery of His saving
purpose, communicated that revelation precisely as He wished it to be communicated. It is something very different from
the "inspiration" felt by poets. It is something other than the gracious enlightenment which is given by God to all whom
He purposes to save. Recording what God revealed was not left to the natural, or even the gracious, abilities of men. God
took steps to ensure that not only were His revealed thoughts conveyed to us in a generally accurate way, but in words
which precisely communicated what was in His mind. "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private
interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man; but holy men of God spake as they were moved
by the Holy Ghost" (2 Pet 1:20,21). They were not left to interpret as best they could what God revealed to them, but God
moved them - carried them along - in such a way that the words they used give the precise record of His revelation which
God intended.
Had good men been left to themselves to communicate the revelation God gave them, we would have a human, fallible account
and could not be sure of the divine truth of what was written. But God gave them not merely the thoughts, but also the
words, which convey these God-given thoughts in the best possible way, so that when we read their words we are reading
the very words of God. They were the mouth through which God spoke His own words. The Holy Spirit of God so controlled
the writers of Scripture that their words were the words spoken by the Holy Spirit. All of Scripture, from Genesis to Revelation
- in its words as well as its thoughts - is the product of a supernatural work of God which ensures that it is inerrant,
infallible, wholly trustworthy.
The Bible was written by men, not by machines. The circumstances, experiences and characteristics of these men come through
in many of their writings. Even the style of one is different from that of another. When they wrote they were generally
exercising their own faculties, although there were times when they wrote things by the direction of God which were well
beyond their own comprehension. That is why Peter could speak about "the salvation of your souls, of which salvation the
prophets have inquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: searching what,
or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings
of Christ, and the glory that should follow. Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did
minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost
sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into" (1 Pet 1:9-12).
But the men, their circumstances, characteristics, experiences and faculties were prepared by God. God made Moses what
he was, and used Moses to write the law. God made Paul what he was, and used Paul to write his various epistles. God took
these men whom He had prepared and carried them along supernaturally so that they wrote exactly what He intended them to
write. It was their writing, but it was God's words that were written.
God the Holy Spirit brought directly to bear on the writers of Scripture a divine influence which ensured that, as long
as they thought and spoke and wrote under this influence, all their statements accurately conveyed what God revealed to
them of His mind. Thus we have the thoughts of God infallibly communicated to us in what are the words of God as well as
the words of men. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God" (2 Tim 3:16) - it is God-breathed - the exact formulation
of what God wished us to know. Inspiration preserved the writers from error, which would be natural to them as sinful men,
and guided them in their expression of thoughts and use of words so that what they wrote is God's own Word - "making the
voice of God speak to us in a human accent, and His Word to address us in our own tongue", as Bannerman puts it.
It is one thing to say what inspiration is - it is something else to explain the divine mode of inspiration. The Bible
defines inspiration but does not explain what we might call the mechanics of it. The exercise of their own faculties was
harnessed and controlled by the Holy Spirit, so that the human authors spoke the pure truth of God. The manner in which
the Spirit's activity and the writer's faculties combined in this work has not been revealed to our finite minds. Even
on the human level we can be influenced by others in ways which affect our thoughts and utterances.
How presumptuous it is for man to think that God cannot, without doing violence to the nature
of the penmen, influence His own creatures so as to ensure that they will convey precisely what is in His mind in the terms
in which He wishes it to be conveyed. "He that planted the ear, shall He not hear? He that formed the eye, shall He not see?" (Ps
94:9). Shall He who made man and gave him his faculties be unable to work through these faculties in a way which ensures
that the outcome is exactly as He intends? God's grace and wisdom and power are manifested in providing us with a record
of His revelation which comes in thoughts and experiences and words that speak to us as human beings, but which is no less
His own infallible word to us. It is therefore entirely appropriate that we should, for example, say, "Let us read the Word
of God. Let us read the Epistle of Paul to the Romans."
Endnotes:
1. These articles are based on an address to a Trinitarian Bible Society meeting
in Belfast in 1999 entitled The Reformed Doctrine of Inspiration - Its Relevance Today and a paper given at
the 2004 Theological Conference entitled Recognising Divine Inspiration: A Study in the Westminster Confession
of Faith, Chapter 1. This article, after noting why this teaching is described as the Reformed doctrine
of Inspiration, briefly outlines the doctrine. Future articles (DV) consider the reason we have for believing this doctrine
and how it is that a sinner comes to recognise the divine inspiration of the Bible. A final article draws attention to
the importance of this doctrine, its significance and relevance for today.
2. The Shorter
Catechism, answer 4.
3. James Bannerman, Inspiration, p 136.
4. Inspiration, p 151.
5. See Westminster Confession 1:1.
|