Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland

Reformed in Doctrine, Worship, and Practice

“Thou hast given a banner to them that fear thee, that it may be displayed because of the truth.” Psalm 60:4

  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • What We Contend For
    • What We Believe
    • How We Worship
    • How We Are Organised
    • Important Documents
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Articles
  • Publications
    • Free Presbyterian Magazine
    • Young People’s Magazine
    • Gaelic Supplement – An Earrann Ghàidhlig
    • Synod Reports
    • Religion and Morals Committee Reports
  • Audio
    • Sermons
    • Theological Conferences
    • Youth Conferences
  • Congregations
    • Places of Worship
    • Current Ministers
    • Galleries of FP Churches
  • International
    • Zimbabwe Mission
    • Other International Congregations
    • Translation Work
    • Metrical Psalms in Various Languages
  • History
    • History of the FP Church
    • Congregational Histories
    • Deceased Ministers and Probationers
    • Obituaries and Synod Tributes
    • Moderators of Synod etc.
  • Spiritual Help
    • How to Find Spiritual Help
    • How may a sinner be saved?
    • How may someone know if they are truly saved?
    • Spiritual Mindedness
    • Scripture and Catechism Exercises 2020-21
  • Bookshop
Home / About Us / What We Contend For / The Lord’s Supper / Why do the minister and elders interview intending communicants?

Why do the minister and elders interview intending communicants?

This question may occur to some people when they consider the Scriptural requirement, “Let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup” (1 Cor. 11:28).

Perhaps some people feel it is a daunting prospect to be interviewed by the Kirk Session. There is no intention that it should be so. It can be one of the Session’s more pleasurable duties, to be speaking with individuals having a genuine desire to come to the Lord’s Table for the first time.

It is Scripture rather than the Church that makes this requirement. The Session must interview intending communicants, in order to discharge faithfully the responsibilities required of them by the Word of God.

Individuals certainly do have their own responsibility: “Let a man examine himself”. However, the Lord’s Supper is not merely an individual activity. It is a communion with the communicant membership of a particular congregation amongst others. It is a seal of the covenant of grace and a seal of church membership and of church privileges. It is a pledge of the fullest communion in God’s visible church upon earth. These are high privileges, and it has pleased the King and Head of the Church to guard them by means of those whom He has appointed in His Church.

The elders of the congregation in which the Lord’s Supper is observed have a duty both to Christ as Head of the Church and to the souls of those over whom they have oversight. “Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account; that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you” (Heb. 13:17).

Elders have been set in the Church, together with the minister, for the purpose of the edification of the body and to bring all to a maturity of faith (Eph. 4:11-13). Paul calls this “our authority which the Lord hath given us for edification” (2 Cor. 10: 8). The interview, then, is meant to be for edification. It is to help the individual see their condition.

It is not easy for anyone to sit in front of the elders and describe the things that matter most to them. The minister and elders are well aware of this, and will seek to ask appropriate questions in a sensitive way, in order to help the person describe his or her experience. Some have found it helpful when they have confessed the Lord before others for the first time during their meeting with the Session. It is a great privilege for any Session to hear this. The Session also prays with the individual, and it may be that this too is found to be edifying.

Ministers are called “the stewards of God”, particularly stewards of the mysteries of God, who are required to be found faithful (Titus 1:7, 1 Cor. 4:1-2). Faithfulness means showing discernment in the questions that they ask ,and may mean withholding the privilege of the Lord’s Supper from those who do not show sufficient evidence of a profession that is in conformity to God’s Word. It would not be edifying to the individual or to the Church if such were to be admitted.

The elders are to watch over the Church: “Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which He hath purchased with His own blood.” There is a duty to be strictly attentive, active and cautious in this responsibility (Acts 20:17,28-31). The elders must only admit those who publicly profess faith in Christ and who live in conformity to that profession (Titus 1:16, Matt. 7:21). They are like the porters under the Old Testament: “And he set the porters at the gates of the house of the Lord, that none which was unclean in any thing should enter in” (2 Chron. 23:19).

The Lord Jesus Christ has given to these officers the keys of the kingdom (Matt. 16:19; 18:17-18; John 20:21-23; 2 Cor. 2:6-8). “Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth, shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven” (Matt. 18:18; note that this is addressed in the plural – ye, you). The Westminster Confession asserts on this basis that elders exercise the keys of the kingdom:

To these officers the keys of the kingdom of heaven are committed, by virtue whereof they have power respectively to retain and remit sins, to shut that kingdom against the impenitent, both by the word and censures; and to open it unto penitent sinners, by the ministry of the gospel, and by absolution from censures, as occasion shall require.

Communion token, given to approved communicants

Communion token,
given to approved communicants

Having received the keys from Christ, the Session must be very careful to open the door of admission only to those whom Christ would have admitted. They are not to conduct a minute inquisition, but are to look for a profession of faith which is appropriately evident and accredited.

There are three dimensions to Christian profession: doctrine, duty and experience. These same dimensions are also necessary to communion with Christ: “He that hath My commandments [doctrine], and keepeth them [duty], he it is that loveth Me: and he that loveth Me shall be loved of My Father, and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him [experience]” (John 14:21). These are those “that join themselves to the Lord, to serve Him, and to love the name of the Lord” (Isa. 56:6).

This faith, love and obedience needs to be tested in an objective manner if a court of the church is to admit individuals to the privilege of the sacrament. They cannot, however, know the secret state of anyone’s soul. They can only assess the evidence of the outward profession and consistent conduct of the person applying to be received as a communicant (Acts 19:18). It is admission to visible ordinances within the visible Church on the basis of a genuine visible profession. The secret things of the heart can be examined only by the individuals themselves. Examination by the elders does mean, however, that people are brought to face the seriousness of what it means to partake of the Lord’s Supper.

The Holy Spirit in the Word of God requires men to live so that they “adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things” (Titus 2:10). There must be a credible profession manifested by one’s life. There must be no public and willful disobedience of Scripture duties. “Be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves” (James 1:22). This is important because “by their fruit ye shall know them” (Matt. 3:10; 7 :17). We cannot look into men’s hearts. We can only verify from what we can see whether there is a credible conformity to Scripture in their lives as required. “And hereby we do know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He that saith, I know Him, and keepeth not His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him” (1 John 2:3-4). “If ye love me, keep My Commandments”, Christ says; “He that loveth Me not keepeth not My savings”; “If ye keep My Commandments, ye shall abide in My love”; “Ye are My friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you” (John 14:15,24; 15:10,14).

How is the Lord’s Supper to be kept in sincerity?

In 1 Corinthians 5:1-8 the Apostle Paul shows that the Lord’s Supper is the New Testament Passover. As leaven was to be eradicated from Israelite homes in preparation for the Passover, so the Church is to be purged of the “leaven” of hypocrisy in order to maintain its true witness and profession. As they sit at the Lord’s Table, the Lord’s people are to “keep the feast”, in the New Testament sense, purely and in sincerity – “not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth”.

Paul condemned them for keeping the man in their fellowship and allowing him to come to the communion Table (1 Cor. 5:2). They could not simply leave such a man to examine himself and refuse to interfere with the sincerity of that self-examination: they must do their duty unto Christ: “Do not ye judge them that are within?” (1 Cor. 5:12).

Paul seemed to deal very severely with the man. But was it more unkind for Paul to deliver the transgressor to Satan, than for the Corinthians to allow his continuing membership in the Church and participation in the Lord’s Supper? Paul’s apparent severity sought the transgressor’s reformation and salvation, while the indifferent tolerance of the Corinthians would have tended towards his eternal ruin. It is important to restrain instances of clear disobedience before they develop further to the ruin of the individual (Jude 23).

If men know about sin and turn a blind eye to it, they practically involve themselves in it. “Be not partakers of other men’s sins” (1 Tim. 5:22). What we read of Eli is very solemn: “For I have told him that I will judge his house for ever for the iniquity which he knoweth; because his sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not” (1 Sam. 3:13).

The mind of the Westminster Assembly, as expressed by Robert Baillie, was that they most strongly believed in:

the Church’s divine right to keep from the sacrament all who are scandalous; and if they cannot obtain the free exercise of that power which Christ hath given them, they will lay down their charges, and rather choose all afflictions than to sin by profaning the holy Table.

With a view to celebrating the Lord’s Supper properly, the Kirk Session at Corinth was to constitute itself into a court of Christ’s Church, in the name and by the authority of the Lord Jesus Christ, and “purge out the old leaven”, so that they might partake of this holy sacrament in an acceptable manner. “Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us” (1 Cor. 5:6-7).

As in all things in the Church, “cursed be he that doeth the work of the Lord negligently” (Jer. 48:10). The elders must not follow their own convenience but the Lord’s injunction: “Let all things be done decently and in order” (1 Cor. 14:40). To do otherwise would expose the Church and the truth to reproach before men. It would be a carelessness for the souls of men not to withhold them from eating and drinking condemnation to themselves (1 Cor. 11:27,29). “Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you” (Matt. 7:6).

The Westminster Larger Catechism, question 173, asks:

May any who profess the faith, and desire to come to the Lord’s Supper, be kept from it?

The answer is given:

Such as are found to be ignorant or scandalous, notwithstanding their profession of the faith, and desire to come to the Lord’s Supper, may and ought to be kept from that sacrament, by the power which Christ has left in his church, until they receive instruction, and manifest their reformation.

If persons are admitted concerning whose profession the Session knows nothing, it cannot be reconciled with the clearly stated requirement of the Westminster Confession (29:8) which says:

Ignorant and ungodly persons, as they are unfit to enjoy communion with [Christ], so are they unworthy of the Lord’s table; and cannot, without great sin against Christ, while they remain such, partake of these holy mysteries, or be admitted thereunto. [Note that the Confession says that people must be admitted to the Lord’s Table – they cannot admit themselves.]

John Calvin summarises the whole matter very well:

Therefore the Lord’s Supper should only be given to those who are known and approved by the rule of charity and religion, a rule which must be practised in the administration of the Supper, also requiring confession and the acknowledgment that, in our life, nothing contradicts it. Ministers, therefore, act in a holy and correct manner, both by their ministry and by its dignity, when they receive only those persons to the sacrament whom they first of all know to be approved and instructed.

Common Objections to this practice

Although many churches have cast these things aside in our own day, we know that there was a carefulness concerning who was admitted to the Lord’s Table in the period of the Early Church, following on from the New Testament. This was restored at the time of the Reformation, on the basis of Scripture. Despite this, however, it does not suit the individualism of our age, and some take offence at the idea that there should be any restraint upon individuals doing as they wish. The objections that are raised are along the lines of what follows.

Objection: “Is a verbal warning from the pulpit for each person to examine themselves not sufficient?”

Answer: Reliance on the word of warning from the pulpit alone fails to fulfil the Scriptural requirements that we have noted. This would also introduce a stricter standard for admission to Baptism than the Lord’s Supper. Before a person is allowed to present himself, or his children, for Baptism, the Session must be satisfied as to his profession and life. However, if there is only a verbal warning in the case of the Lord’s Supper, then the candidate is left with the entire responsibility himself as to coming to the Lord’s Table.

Objection: “It seems unkind and intolerant to judge on the basis of external matters in a person’s life, seeing that we are saved through faith alone.”

Answer: It is true that salvation is through faith alone, but true faith is never alone. There are always the works through grace that support and evidence the character of faith, so the Session is right to proceed on the basis of the outward life.

Objection: “It is the Lord’s Table, not the Church’s Table or the Kirk Session’s Table.”

Answer: The fact that it is the Lord’s Table means that we must be careful in relation to it, and that means being bound only by what is acceptable to Him in terms of who should be admitted. We would not invite anyone we pleased to a friend’s table but consult their preferences. How much more ought this to be the case when it concerns the things of the Most High!

Objection: “Why should a Session stand in the way of someone’s desire to partake of the Lord’s Supper?”

Answer: We must go according to Scripture rather than individual desires. What if despite his desires there is clear evidence that his profession is not consistent? It is not just a matter for the individual but for the whole Church, which is why Christ has appointed those who have oversight of this matter within the Church.

Objection: “Is it not safer to open the sacrament to all that profess to be a child of the Lord, rather than run the risk of denying someone who might be a true child of God that which they have a right to?”

Answer: Even if we know a man to be a child of God, it does not follow that he is to be admitted to fellowship in the Church. “If any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed. Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother” (2 Thess. 3:15). Though he is a brother, yet his disobedient conduct means that he cannot be allowed to partake of the Lord’s Supper and given this privilege of fellowship. It would not be safe to do so, and it is more loving to show such a one the danger of his ways. It is not a question of rights, but responsibilities. The true children of God cannot presume to come to the Table of the Lord unless they are able to partake worthily. They must still examine themselves.

Objection: “No one is without sin.”

Answer: We agree that no one is without sin, but the Session cannot detect the sin of the heart and can only look to whether the life of those seeking to make a profession is consistent with what Scripture requires. It is not all sin that bars from the Lord’s Table.

Objection: “Only the one receiving the Lord’s Supper unworthily can judge whether this is so; and in any case they bring judgment upon themselves.”

Answer: Those partaking unworthily may indeed receive chastisement of the Lord, but if they have a scandalous profession and partake unworthily, this is an occasion of stumbling to others and brings reproach upon Christ and His cause. If the Session were to allow this, they would bring judgment upon themselves too.

Matthew A Vogan

About Us

  • Who We Are
    • The Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland – Why It Exists Today
    • The Free Presbyterian Church Catechism
      • A Catechism of the History and Principles of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland – PDF
      • 1. Origins of the Free Presbyterian Church (1-13)
      • 2. The Westminster Confession of Faith (14–22)
      • 3. The Declaratory Act and the Free Church (23–53)
      • 4. The Infallibility of Scripture (54-67)
      • 5. Erroneous Doctrines (68-77)
      • 6. Innovations in Worship (78-93)
      • 7. Church and State (94-104)
      • 8. Church office-bearers (105-130)
      • 9. Church Courts (131-140)
      • 10. Church Unity (141-149)
      • 11. Modern Religious Cults (150-159)
      • 12. Modern Errors (160-170)
      • 13. Evolution (171-175)
      • 14. Christ’s Second Coming (176-179)
      • Appendix 1. Deed of Separation 1893
      • Appendix 2. Free Church of Scotland Declaratory Act 1892
      • Appendix 3. FP Synod Resolutions
      • Appendix 4. Questions put to Office-bearers and Formula to be signed by them
      • Appendix 5. Memorandum on the Church of Scotland Enabling Bill 1920
    • The Declaratory Act Controversy
      • Declaratory Act – Reasons for Separation
      • How the Declaratory Act changed the Constitution of the Free Church
      • Explanatory Criticism of the Declaratory Act
      • The Consequences of the Declaratory Act
      • The Declaratory Act and Admission into Office in the Free Church
      • The Constitutional Aspects of the Declaratory Act
      • A Brief History of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland
  • What We Contend For
    • Our Free Presbyterian Heritage
    • The Authorised Version
      • The Importance of the Authorised Version for the Church in Britain
      • 2015 Synod Resolution on Versions of the Bible
    • Evangelical or Reformed
    • A Protestant Witness
      • The Pope and the Constitution of the United Kingdom
      • The Pope as the Head of a False Religion
      • Papal Infallibility
      • The Pope in Scripture
    • The Five Points of Calvinism
      • The Canons of Dort
    • The Free Offer of the Gospel
    • Resolution on Creed Subscription
    • Church Discipline
      • The Purposes of Church Discipline
      • The Church’s responsibility to administer Biblical discipline faithfully
      • The benefits of exercising Church discipline
      • Accusations Levelled against a Church Exercising Discipline
    • Baptism
      • Subjects of Baptism – by Rev. William MacIntyre
      • Mode of Baptism – by Rev. William Macintyre
      • Should Infants be Baptised?
    • The Lord’s Supper
      • Why do the minister and elders interview intending communicants?
      • Restricted Communion
      • Fencing the Table
        • The Origins of Fencing the Table
    • Our Separate Stance
    • The Sabbath
      • Why the Sabbath should Still be Kept
      • How the Sabbath should be Kept
      • Sabbath or Lord’s Day – not “Sunday”
      • What about using Public Transport on the Sabbath?
        • Synod’s Statement in Reference to Church-going by Public Conveyances on the Sabbath
        • Historical Controversy over Using Public Transport on the Lord’s Day
    • Family worship
      • Family worship – a recent overview
      • Family worship – a recent address to young people
      • Family worship – a convicting appeal from C H Spurgeon
      • Family worship – a wartime appeal from more than a century ago
      • Family worship – a review
      • Family worship – another wartime appeal
      • Family worship – an illustration of its power
    • Distinctions between Male and Female
      • Men and Women Equal in Value
      • The Distinct Roles of Men and Women
      • Can women lead in public prayer?
      • Distinct Clothing for Men and Women
      • Long hair for women and short hair for men
        • If a Woman have Long Hair, it is a Glory to Her
  • What We Believe
  • How We Worship
    • Order of Service
    • The Right Way to Worship
      • Standing for Prayer
      • The Charismatic Movement – The Gifts have Ceased
    • The Regulative Principle of Worship
      • Does the Bible tell us how we are to Worship?
      • The Importance of the Regulative Principle for Today
      • The Regulative Principle as defined by the Scottish Reformers and others
    • Exclusive Psalmody
      • Does the Bible tell us What to Sing?
      • Why Psalms Only
    • No Musical Instruments
      • Musical Instruments in Worship
    • No Christian “Festivals”
      • Should Christians Celebrate Christmas?
  • How We Are Organised
    • Church Courts
    • Scripture does teach the right form of Church Government
    • The Apostolic Church – Which Is It?
      • Statement of the Question
      • Meaning of the word Church
      • Government of the Church
      • Apostolic Principles
      • The First Principle
      • The Second Principle
      • The Third Principle
      • The Fourth Principle
      • The Fifth Principle
      • The Sixth Principle
      • Application of the Test
      • Application of the Test to Prelacy
      • Application of the Test to Independency
      • Application of the Test to Presbytery
      • Application of the Test – Result
  • Important Documents
    • The Scots Confession
    • The First Book of Discipline
    • The Second Book of Discipline
    • The National Covenant
    • The Solemn League and Covenant
    • The Westminster Confession of Faith
    • The Larger Catechism
    • The Shorter Catechism
    • The Directory for Public Worship
    • The Form of Presbyterial Church Government
    • The Sum of Saving Knowledge
    • The Directory for Family Worship
    • The Claim Declaration and Protest
    • The Protest
    • The Deed of Separation 1893
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Calendar

  1. 29 Jan - Meeting of Presbytery: Asia Pacific
  2. 24 Feb - Meeting of Presbytery: Southern
  3. 9 Mar - Meeting of Presbyteries: Western and Northern

View All Events

Latest Articles

  • Locked down for ever!
  • Special Offers on New Books for January
  • Bookroom Notice

Recently Added Audio

  • Jesus in the midst 3 Jan 2021
  • The Father calling sinners to Christ 22 Nov 2020
  • The Day of Salvation 27 Dec 2020
  • Jesus standing still 8 Nov 2020
  • Then cometh the end 27 Dec 2020
  • Christ will still build His Church 10 Jan 2021
  • Cast thy burden on the Lord 15 Nov 2020
  • Bring him hither to Me 6 Dec 2020
  • The Master is come 20 Dec 2020
  • Humbling and lifting up 13 Dec 2020

View All Sermons

Download Latest Issues:
The Free Presbyterian Magazine
Young People’s Magazine

Free Presbyterian Places of Worship

Browse the Church Bookshop

Solitude Improved by Divine Meditation by Nathanael Ranew, £11.99
The Priesthood of Christ by Peter MacBride, £6.36
None Other Name: Daily Devotional Readings by 19th Century Scottish Ministers compiled by L J van Valen, £11.79
Thoughts on Religious Experience by Archibald Alexander, £12.49
William Farel by Frances Bevan,  £12.49

Back to top

Website Contact

Rev Keith M Watkins
[email protected]

Moderator of Synod

Rev J Bruce Jardine
FP Manse, Tarbert
Isle of Harris, HS3 3DF
UK

Clerk of Synod

Rev Keith M Watkins
Free Presbyterian Manse, Ferry Road, Leverburgh, Isle of Harris, HS5 3UA, UK.
[email protected]

General Treasurer

Mr William Campbell
133 Woodlands Road, Glasgow,
G3 6LE, UK.
[email protected]

Copyright © 2021 Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland · Log in · Subscribe via RSS · Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more.