Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland

Reformed in Doctrine, Worship, and Practice

“Thou hast given a banner to them that fear thee, that it may be displayed because of the truth.” Psalm 60:4

  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • What We Contend For
    • What We Believe
    • How We Worship
    • How We Are Organised
    • Important Documents
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Articles
  • Publications
    • Free Presbyterian Magazine
    • Young People’s Magazine
    • Gaelic Supplement – An Earrann Ghàidhlig
    • Synod Reports
    • Religion and Morals Committee Reports
  • Audio
    • Sermons
    • Theological Conferences
    • Youth Conferences
  • Congregations
    • Places of Worship
    • Current Ministers
    • Galleries of FP Churches
  • International
    • Zimbabwe Mission
    • Other International Congregations
    • Translation Work
    • Metrical Psalms in Various Languages
  • History
    • History of the FP Church
    • Congregational Histories
    • Deceased Ministers and Probationers
    • Obituaries and Synod Tributes
    • Moderators of Synod etc.
  • Spiritual Help
    • How to Find Spiritual Help
    • How may a sinner be saved?
    • How may someone know if they are truly saved?
    • Spiritual Mindedness
    • Scripture and Catechism Exercises 2021-22
  • Bookshop
Home / About Us / Who We Are / The Declaratory Act Controversy / The Declaratory Act and Admission into Office in the Free Church

The Declaratory Act and Admission into Office in the Free Church

It has frequently been urged in recent controversy that the fact that the Declaratory Act was not put by the Free Church into the formula which candidates for office are required to sign, was a feature of the case that relieved the consciences of all who were opposed to the Act. On this account it was affirmed that the Act was not of binding obligation upon any, and therefore that such as did not accept it were free from all responsibility as to the doctrines it contained.

In former articles we pointed out that this view of matters is a mistaken one, and that while individuals may not be personally asked to endorse the doctrines of the Act, the Church has already endorsed these doctrines in their name, and involved them in the guilt and consequences of this procedure. The Act itself has become a standing law and constitution in the church, and individuals and church courts are bound to recognise it as such. All protests against it are invalid and have proved ineffectual.

The fact is also admitted on all hands, that by the direct authority of the church all are entitled to sign the formula “in view of the Declaratory Act”. So that the church has proclaimed liberty to all within her borders to believe, maintain, and defend the doctrines of the Declaratory Act – a proclamation which proves that the body that has made it has surrendered her testimony for the truth of God and has become the propagandist of error.

In view of these facts it is our present purpose to show:

  1. First, that the non-insertion of the Act into the formula makes matters worse instead of better, and
  2. Secondly, that the liberty given to all candidates to sign the formula in view of the Declaratory Act involves a serious train of evils.

1. The non-insertion of the Act in the formula

1. This non-insertion proves the church guilty of a lack of honesty and consistency.

To be consistent she should have embodied this Act alongside the Confession of Faith in the formula. If the doctrines of the Act are sound truth, all are under a moral obligation to believe them, and therefore all ought to be asked to accept them. If they are not such as all are under moral obligation to accept, they should not have been adopted as part of the creed of the church.

2. The non-insertion of the Act into the formula makes all candidates for office who believe in the Act guilty of dishonesty when they sign the formula.

They sign the latter professing to accept the Confession of Faith and other standards without reservation, while at the same moment they do so only “in view of the Declaratory Act”. With their hand they declare that they shall assert, maintain, and defend the whole doctrine of the Confession of Faith, while with their heart they declare they shall do no such thing.

3. The non-insertion of the Act into the formula makes void the very end for which the formula was framed.

If a formula serves any purpose, it is to express the candidate’s adherence to the standards of the church. It is invariably understood that the formula gives a complete index as to the views of the candidate. In the present case, by the non-insertion of this Act the formula fails to embody the entire views of candidates, and so fails to answer the end for which it was framed. Church courts are therefore quite at sea in a great number of cases as to the actual views of those admitted to office. Can any honest mind view this with anything less than dismay? Is it not the duty of all who sit in church courts professing to administer the affairs of Christ’s house, to see to it that they know who they are that they are admitting to the highest offices that responsible beings can occupy? If, therefore, they admit to these offices persons of whose views they are to a large extent ignorant, and who may, for all they know, hold very erroneous doctrines, these members of church courts are, to say the least of it, not acting in a faithful and scriptural manner, and by their conduct are laying themselves open to do incalculable injury to the cause of Christ and the souls of men.

2. The provision by which candidates are entitled to sign the Confession and other standards “in view of the Declaratory Act” involves a serious train of evils:

1. Men of erroneous views may now enter the ministry of the church under a profession of soundness in the faith.

This dishonesty no doubt was perpetrated before this Act was passed, and candidates themselves were solely responsible for their sin, but now the church has sanctioned the dishonesty and made it perfectly lawful.

2. The above provision also makes it lawful for ministers and others who today adhere solely to the doctrines of the Word of God as contained in the Confession, tomorrow to change their mind and accept Declaratory Act doctrines.

Thus the sound Calvinist can become at any moment an Arminian and deny the doctrines of election and man’s total depravity. The man who at one time believed the Bible to be infallible from beginning to end is now entitled to cast doubts upon its inspiration and assert that it contains errors and mistakes.

3. The keys of discipline are now lost.

Church courts, if there are any such, who desire to adhere to the Confession have no power to bring to task men of Declaratory Act views, and can frame no libel against them. These courts are therefore disabled from obeying the command of Christ by His servant – “A man that is an heretic, after the first and second admonition, reject”. They are incapable of performing a very important function of the Church of Christ, the neglect of which will result in evils of a far-reaching character.

4. The constitution of the Church now affords no security to congregations that they will have sound ministers placed over them.

The constitution entitles probationers, while professing to adhere to the whole Confession of Faith, to believe in erroneous doctrines; and while it is possible some sound probationers may still be found, yet these rare cases do not affect the above facts. The Universal interests of the cause of truth are by no means conserved because it may happen that one or two individuals of sound views unfaithfully cling to a corrupt church.

5. There is now no guarantee that those ministers who are themselves sound in their views will have successors who shall transmit the testimony faithfully to posterity.

It is sometimes urged by “constitutional” ministers in the Free Church that if they left their churches, they would be opening a door for young men of unsound principles. But surely a day is coming when they shall have to leave their pulpits for ever, and what safeguard have they that the door will not then be opened for unfaithful men to occupy their places? A minister of Christ has no more responsible duty laid upon him than that he should commit the truth to faithful successors, as the welfare of many succeeding generations in his congregation may depend upon how he acted in connection with such an important matter. It becomes him, therefore, to ask himself the question, is he using all scriptural means to secure this end? The constitution of the Free Church, he finds, entitles all its probationers to sign the Confession, “in view of the Declaratory Act”, and so he cannot but conclude that there is no guarantee whatsoever there for a sound and faithful ministry.

The minister therefore who, notwithstanding this, rests satisfied with the present constitution by abiding under its shadow, is content to lack the security which he is under the highest obligation to seek, that his successors shall be sound in the faith, and he therefore exposes to the utmost peril the future spiritual interests of his congregation. We would with all earnestness commend this aspect of their position to those ministers in the Free Church who have any true desire for the maintenance of sound doctrines, and for the transmission of pure Gospel privileges to coming generations.

It is plainly proved by the foregoing facts that the only way in which a sound ministry and a pure Gospel can be maintained and handed down to posterity, is by separation from a church that gives a free licence to erroneous and soul-destroying error, and by the maintenance of a separate testimony on behalf of the truth. Division is not desirable for its own sake and should in no wise be sought after. We can, however, honestly affirm that the body to which we belong separated from the Free Church not for division, but for union in the faith. It is no privilege to remain in a church, however large, that has cast overboard the truth of God. It is an unspeakable privilege to be a doorkeeper in a church, however small, that maintains a pure testimony for Christ.

Previous

Upcoming Events

May 26
26 May - 30 May

Communion: Chiedza

Jun 2
2 Jun - 6 Jun

Communion: Perth

Jun 9
9 Jun - 13 Jun

Communions: Nkayi, North Uist, Santa Fe

Jun 23
23 Jun - 27 Jun

Communions: Bulawayo, Gairloch, Inverness

Jun 30
30 Jun - 4 Jul

Communion: Beauly

View Calendar

About Us

  • Who We Are
    • The Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland – Why It Exists Today
    • The Free Presbyterian Church Catechism
      • A Catechism of the History and Principles of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland – PDF
      • 1. Origins of the Free Presbyterian Church (1-13)
      • 2. The Westminster Confession of Faith (14–22)
      • 3. The Declaratory Act and the Free Church (23–53)
      • 4. The Infallibility of Scripture (54-67)
      • 5. Erroneous Doctrines (68-77)
      • 6. Innovations in Worship (78-93)
      • 7. Church and State (94-104)
      • 8. Church office-bearers (105-130)
      • 9. Church Courts (131-140)
      • 10. Church Unity (141-149)
      • 11. Modern Religious Cults (150-159)
      • 12. Modern Errors (160-170)
      • 13. Evolution (171-175)
      • 14. Christ’s Second Coming (176-179)
      • Appendix 1. Deed of Separation 1893
      • Appendix 2. Free Church of Scotland Declaratory Act 1892
      • Appendix 3. FP Synod Resolutions
      • Appendix 4. Questions put to Office-bearers and Formula to be signed by them
      • Appendix 5. Memorandum on the Church of Scotland Enabling Bill 1920
    • The Declaratory Act Controversy
      • Declaratory Act – Reasons for Separation
      • How the Declaratory Act changed the Constitution of the Free Church
      • Explanatory Criticism of the Declaratory Act
      • The Consequences of the Declaratory Act
      • The Declaratory Act and Admission into Office in the Free Church
      • The Constitutional Aspects of the Declaratory Act
      • A Brief History of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland
  • What We Contend For
    • Our Free Presbyterian Heritage
    • The Authorised Version
      • The Importance of the Authorised Version for the Church in Britain
      • 2015 Synod Resolution on Versions of the Bible
    • Evangelical or Reformed
    • A Protestant Witness
      • The Pope and the Constitution of the United Kingdom
      • The Pope as the Head of a False Religion
      • Papal Infallibility
      • The Pope in Scripture
    • The Five Points of Calvinism
      • The Canons of Dort
    • The Free Offer of the Gospel
    • Resolution on Creed Subscription
    • Church Discipline
      • The Purposes of Church Discipline
      • The Church’s responsibility to administer Biblical discipline faithfully
      • The benefits of exercising Church discipline
      • Accusations Levelled against a Church Exercising Discipline
    • Baptism
      • Subjects of Baptism – by Rev. William MacIntyre
      • Mode of Baptism – by Rev. William Macintyre
      • Should Infants be Baptised?
    • The Lord’s Supper
      • Why do the minister and elders interview intending communicants?
      • Restricted Communion
      • Fencing the Table
        • The Origins of Fencing the Table
    • Our Separate Stance
    • The Sabbath
      • Why the Sabbath should Still be Kept
      • How the Sabbath should be Kept
      • Sabbath or Lord’s Day – not “Sunday”
      • What about using Public Transport on the Sabbath?
        • Synod’s Statement in Reference to Church-going by Public Conveyances on the Sabbath
        • Historical Controversy over Using Public Transport on the Lord’s Day
    • Family worship
      • Family worship – a recent overview
      • Family worship – a recent address to young people
      • Family worship – a convicting appeal from C H Spurgeon
      • Family worship – a wartime appeal from more than a century ago
      • Family worship – a review
      • Family worship – another wartime appeal
      • Family worship – an illustration of its power
    • Distinctions between Male and Female
      • Men and Women Equal in Value
      • The Distinct Roles of Men and Women
      • Can women lead in public prayer?
      • Distinct Clothing for Men and Women
      • Long hair for women and short hair for men
        • If a Woman have Long Hair, it is a Glory to Her
  • What We Believe
  • How We Worship
    • Order of Service
    • The Right Way to Worship
      • Standing for Prayer
      • The Charismatic Movement – The Gifts have Ceased
    • The Regulative Principle of Worship
      • Does the Bible tell us how we are to Worship?
      • The Importance of the Regulative Principle for Today
      • The Regulative Principle as defined by the Scottish Reformers and others
    • Exclusive Psalmody
      • Does the Bible tell us What to Sing?
      • Why Psalms Only
    • No Musical Instruments
      • Musical Instruments in Worship
    • No Christian “Festivals”
      • Should Christians Celebrate Christmas?
  • How We Are Organised
    • Church Courts
    • Scripture does teach the right form of Church Government
    • The Apostolic Church – Which Is It?
      • Statement of the Question
      • Meaning of the word Church
      • Government of the Church
      • Apostolic Principles
      • The First Principle
      • The Second Principle
      • The Third Principle
      • The Fourth Principle
      • The Fifth Principle
      • The Sixth Principle
      • Application of the Test
      • Application of the Test to Prelacy
      • Application of the Test to Independency
      • Application of the Test to Presbytery
      • Application of the Test – Result
  • Important Documents
    • The Scots Confession
    • The First Book of Discipline
    • The Second Book of Discipline
    • The National Covenant
    • The Solemn League and Covenant
    • The Westminster Confession of Faith
    • The Larger Catechism
    • The Shorter Catechism
    • The Directory for Public Worship
    • The Form of Presbyterial Church Government
    • The Sum of Saving Knowledge
    • The Directory for Family Worship
    • The Claim Declaration and Protest
    • The Protest
    • The Deed of Separation 1893
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Latest Articles

  • Synod Resolution re The Church of Scotland’s Declaration of Friendship with the Roman Catholic Church
  • Worksheets for the Scripture and Catechism Exercises 3
  • Special Offers on New Books for May

Recently Added Audio

  • Synod Sermon 2022 17 May 2022
  • Earth, Earth, Earth 7 Nov 2021
  • The Dew upon Israel 3 Nov 2021
  • The Queen of Sheba’s Visit 31 Oct 2021
  • Loving this present world 24 Oct 2021
  • God’s gracious call to repentance 8 Sep 2021
  • All things through Christ’s strength 5 Sep 2021
  • Still unsaved 21 Nov 2021
  • Christ always the same 21 Nov 2021
  • Paul preaching Christ’s death and resurrection 14 Nov 2021

View All Sermons

Download Latest Issues:
The Free Presbyterian Magazine
Young People’s Magazine

Free Presbyterian Places of Worship

Browse the Church Bookshop

Special Offers on New Books This Month

The Peep of Day by F L Mortimer, £6.30

Comfort in Affliction by James Buchanan, £3.95

Art of Divine Contentment by Thomas Watson, £2.50

Life of John Knox by Thomas M’Crie, £4.40

Revivals of the Eighteenth Century by Duncan MacFarlan, £4.70

(Postage is extra.)
Available from the Free Presbyterian Bookoom.

Back to top

Website Contact

Rev Keith M Watkins
[email protected]

Moderator of Synod

Rev Donald A Ross
Free Presbyterian Manse
Laide
Ross-shire
IV22 2NB
[email protected]

Clerk of Synod

Rev Keith M Watkins
Free Presbyterian Manse, Ferry Road, Leverburgh, Isle of Harris, HS5 3UA, UK.
[email protected]

General Treasurer

Mr William Campbell
133 Woodlands Road, Glasgow,
G3 6LE, UK.
[email protected]

Copyright © 2022 Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland · Log in · Subscribe via RSS · Privacy Notice