(preached by Rev. A. Ndebele to pupils and staff at Ingwenya,
Sabbath evening, 30th June, 1968)
Isaiah 66, v. 2. “… And to this man will I look even to him
that is of a humble and contrite spirit and that trembleth at my
word”.
1. All things belong unto the Lord.
It would appear that Israel was concerned with those things
which could be seen by the eye of man; offerings, etc., which they
could bring to be acceptable unto the Lord, diligently applying
themselves unto this duty, sacrificing cattle and other animals
unto the Lord and trusting in these for salvation. Their hope and
confidence was on what they had done. If ever they thought of
eternal rest at all they thought on what they had done, how
great a gift they had offered.
But the Lord said this “All things are made by My hand”;
“Heaven is my throne and earth is my footstool” (vs. 1, 2).
Heaven and earth belong unto the Lord and that includes
humans, animals, trees, etc., even precious stones were created
by the Lord. No-one gives new things to Him. Our gifts of gold
and silver, even these were created by God. Our offerings are
not anything new to Him. These offerings were not pleasing in
His sight. There was no room for pride. Some of the Jews were
filled with pride because out of the whole world Jerusalem was
chosen in which to have a house for the worship of God. Israel
prides herself in this. Israel saw different nations coming — the
Queen of Sheba on coming to see Solomon was impressed by the
temple, by his palace, etc. All nations knew that God was wor-
shipped in Israel. All these things were made by the Lord — “If
I needed a temple I could have made one”. The Lord does not
dwell in a house made by hands. Such a great God! the incompre-
hensible, vast, eternal God, gloriously transcending all, far above
our thoughts, how could a small house comprehend this God?
“Heaven is my throne, etc. Where is the house that ye will build
me?” (v. 1). Everything is His by right, by creation. These things
are very external and yet how often our minds are taken up with
this and we rest for our salvation on this. People rest for their
salvation on things done, their prayers for example. “I have prayed.
I am not like other children who disobey Thy laws. I have done
things pleasing in Thy sight and therefore I ought to be safe and
my soul received into heaven”. This was the Jews’ delusion. They
were dependent on their sacrifices and were therefore “certain” of
salvation. It is the thought of many today and many churches
believe this. Criticism is not our aim. We should study what we
stand for. It is not our aim to belittle but we must maintain the truth in Christ Jesus and uphold the faith received through the apostles and prophets, “Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner stone”. Christ must be glorified not man. Those whose delight is in what they have done, are guilty of the sin of Israel. They looked on the skin of their animals — “Look, this is my beast!” — and expected salvation because of this. This was an abomination to the Lord (v. 3). Human sacrifice typified heathen-dom and a sacrifice like this was an abomination and not a fit basis for human salvation. These only typified One to come, they were types and shadows of Jesus and had done their service when Jesus came.
2. “But to this man will I look”.
What kind of man is this? A wise man? A philosopher? Who draws the eyes of Jehovah? With whom is the Lord concerned in the heavens? Who makes the angels admire? — “there is joy in the presence of the angels of God” — among the hosts of “angels and the spirits of just men made perfect around the throne, who cry ‘Holy, holy, holy’.” They look and are surprised at what has taken place. There is the joy with Him who liveth for ever and ever. It is “a man of poor and of a contrite spirit”.
This man is poor. How poor? Has he no clothes, no food in his barn, few blankets? What is the poverty with which the Lord is concerned? He has nothing to bring before the Lord. “When they had nothing to pay He frankly forgave them both”. A sinner has nothing of his own making when approaching the throne of God. He goes dependent on what is in the Lord, on His bounty who has “all things in the hollow of His hands”. He goes because he has nothing and knows himself to be devoid of faith. Lord I believe, help thou mine unbelief”. This man had no faith and was coming as one naked, miserable, blind and with nothing to recommend him. This is the man who is poor in the sight of God and the Lord will look upon this one. He has no goodness in himself, no good works, not even prayers. e.g. the Publican and the Pharisee. The Pharisee thanked God he was not a liar, etc. “I thank the Lord I am so good!” That man had plenty in his own eyes before God, but went away empty.
The man who goes depending upon what the Lord has — “Lord thou hast all, I have nothing”. What has the Lord got for him — (1) a garment to cover his soul, i.e. the righteousness of Christ; (2) the Spirit to fill his heart. He is an empty vessel but rivers of waters will flow out of him. If we have plenty, with what will we receive the Lord’s gifts? — faith, salvation, the righteous garment — if we are already “clothed” how can we receive it?
This man also has a contrite spirit. He is repentant, sorry,
disappointed in himself, ashamed, turning to the Lord. “Against thee, thee only, have I sinned” (Psalm 51). He is sorry he has sinned against the Lord. He goes to the Lord — “He against whom we have sinned” — not to a priest nor anyone else, but to Him against whom he has sinned and asks for pardon and confesses his sins. The Lord will not pass him by.
“To this man will I look . . .”; “Blessed are the poor in spirit”, for they shall be filled! (Matt. 5). The Lord will give to those who are needy not full. This man also trembleth at God’s word.
(a) What does this mean? Two words brought before man; the word of the Church, of man, of parents against the word of God. The word of God means more than the word of anyone else to him. “The word of God is the only rule to direct us . . .” The Lord will not pass by such as tremble. Have you done this? What makes you tremble? The word of a human being? When confronted with two opinions do you please man by committing sin? Which speaks in a more solemn manner to you — the word of God or man? A Christian’s all is governed by the word of God. The Lord says “to him will I look, not on sacrifices, not on what man eats (some still keep the ceremonial law, e.g. S.D.A.’s not eating pigs, etc.). Some are concerned with these things but the new birth, holiness and turning from darkness to light, these points are not emphasised. All this is abomination to the Lord. The man with a poor and contrite spirit, that boy or girl or man or woman will attract the eye of heaven. The Lord will bless that one with a knowledge of himself.
(b) Are there any here who tremble at God’s word? Those who study God’s word to see what God commands; to repent, to cast away all they had; to cease building upon sand, their own works, their parents’ works and not on Christ. They have now learned that if they are saved at all it is of His kindness, of His doing, and marvellous in their eyes. Poor people! nothing to recommend them; ashamed of themselves, knowing they have come short, where could they find anything to be proud of? They have their heads bowed to the ground — saved only through Jehovah. “I will make mention of thy righteousness, of thine only”. Not “we have Abraham to our father”, but they have nothing save Christ alone. “Save me out of thy mercy. Wash away all my sins. Thou art compassionate, righteous, merciful”. This is their hope — not even their prayers. Only hypocrites say their prayers are very good. The righteousness of the Lord alone is their only confidence. “Thou hast subdued hell and death and the grave therefore we are saved”. It is because of what Jesus has done. Our all is found in Him. We go to Him with nothing — of sinfulness we have plenty, of righteousness none. We depend on the holiness of the Lord for “without holiness no man shall see the Lord”.
They are satisfied with Christ, with His holiness, His righteousness.
(c) They tremble at God’s word, in that it rules in their hearts. A person who does not care about the Bible, who goes his own way is a heathen no matter what his profession. If he does not care about what God says he is a man without God or hope, despite his profession, whether he is the Bishop of the whole place or a man of great learning. Those who tremble do things because God says so even if it seems foolish to man. They are satisfied with God’s word and that is what a Christian is. Judge yourselves therefore by this ruler! Do you tremble at God’s word? Do you obey God rather than people? What does the word of God say? e.g. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. We ought to care if it is in God’s word.
3 God sees the marks He Himself has planted — poverty of spirit, contrite heart — and He will come to reveal Himself to them. He will strengthen them and give His Holy Spirit to them and give them the spirit of adoption “whereby they cry ‘Abba father’.” The Holy Spirit understands their desires, their “groanings that cannot be uttered”. He will reveal the things of Christ to them and comfort them, build them up in the faith and encourage them. “He that endures to the end shall be saved”. Those who have these marks are saved. If we do not have them we must seek until we know that these marks belong to us. Do we tremble at His word? Are we poor? Do we condemn ourselves? Are we dependent on God? If not we are not His.
REV. PROFESSOR JOHN DUNCAN, LL.D.
by the late Rev. James S. Sinclair*
* This biographical sketch of Dr Duncan was delivered as a Lecture to The Blythswood Literary Society, Glasgow, and published in the Free Presbyterian Magazine in October and November, 1921, after Mr Sinclair’s death.—Editor.
The spiritual firmament of the Free Protestant Church in 1843 was, by the gracious blessing of God, adorned with a galaxy of stars of the first magnitude — men of eminent grace, commanding gifts, and untiring energy in the service of Christ. There were burning and shining lights in those days, in the enjoyment of whose bright, warm, and holy radiance thousands of God’s people delighted to walk. Glory then dwelt in marked degrees in our land, and not until the Spirit is poured again from on high will the present wilderness blossom anew as the rose. One of these bright, shining stars in the spiritual firmament of the past forms the subject of the present lecture. Not that Dr Duncan occupied
so prominent a place before the eyes of the Church as some other men of renown who might be mentioned — Drs Chalmers, Cunningham, Candlish, Begg, Macdonald, and others — who were outstanding and active leaders in Church Courts and on platforms in all practical efforts for the advancement of the evangelical cause. The star to which our attention is presently directed may be said to have been less conspicuous to general view, not because he was of less magnitude, but because he moved, for most part, in a more select and exalted orbit than others — more among the infinities and eternities than among the ordinary things of time and sense. His biographer (Dr Brown) justly said of him that he was “one of the most remarkable men of this or of any age”, remarkable for profound and varied thoughts, vast learning, deep humility, intense spirituality, and exclusive devotedness to the service of the Lord Jesus.
True, he was also remarkable for a certain absence of mind and irregularity in the ordinary habits of life, as well as for an incurable aversion to the pen — (almost all his discourses and striking sayings were taken down by others) — but possibly all this was divinely ordered so as to prevent hero-worship and glorying in men on the part of admiring friends, dispositions to which fallen human nature, even in the best regulated persons, is exceedingly prone.
So much, briefly, by way of introduction; now to the narrative. I shall begin at the beginning of his life’s history.
John Duncan was born of humble and pious parentage in the year 1796 at Gilcomston, in the parish of Old Machar, Aberdeen. His father, whose Christian name also was John, was “a plain working shoemaker” to trade, and a member of the Original Secession Church to religious profession. His mother, Ann Mutch, was the daughter of a well-to-do farmer and blacksmith, who lived in the country outside of Aberdeen. Originally of the Established Church, she became a member of the Secession Church before she married. Being on a visit to some relatives in Aberdeen she was persuaded by an acquaintance to go to the Secession Church, where she heard the Rev. James Templeton, a worthy minister of the Gospel. “From that day,” Dr Brown tells us, “she worshipped nowhere else; the grace of God took possession of her heart; her whole character was changed. By her Christian influence, a brother and sister joined her; and all three, being received into full communion with the Secession Church, walked every Lord’s Day from Belhelvie (their native place) to Aberdeen and back, a distance of twelve miles, to church.” Mr Duncan, senior, was a member of this congregation, and it was to all appearance, here that Ann Mutch and he made their first acquaintance.
There were several children by the marriage; but all died in infancy except John, who was the eldest, and he was at best a weakly boy. It is related that an attack of small-pox at a very early age “brought him to the gates of death”. One of his mother’s sisters came to see him die, but as she stood and looked upon the poor infant, those words from the 118th Psalm (metrical version) strongly entered her mind: “I shall not die but live, and shall the works of God discover”. This a message of hope concerning the recovery of the apparently dying child, proved also a prediction of future experience and usefulness, as after years verified, to the very full. The terrible disease of small-pox, however, left him with one serious physical defect, it deprived him of the total sight of an eye. In after life he used playfully to boast to his friend, Dr Brown, that he could see better with his one eye than most people could do with their two — a feature, indeed, in the sphere of mental perception that was abundantly demonstrated.
His mother died when he was five or six years of age. This was to him a great loss. As her only surviving child, he was the subject of many prayers. Her warm, loving, and prayerful breath was withdrawn from him, and he was left to the care of his father, who, though a good man, was exceptionally hard of temperament. His maternal uncle, and aunt, who now dwell in Old Aberdeen, showed him, however, the greatest sympathy and kindness; and a wonderful boy they thought him. From his very earliest years he exhibited a predilection for the work of preaching. He would often mount a chair and imitate the minister, and when sent to school he might be observed getting up on a cart and giving a harangue in preaching fashion to his companions who assembled. Dr Brown also relates that one day “his Aunt went to dig potatoes in a field which they had near the sea, taking John with her on her back. On reaching the spot he descried over her shoulder a ship in the distance, and directing her attention to it, exclaimed, “That’s the ship that’s to take me to preach to the heathen.” “But what if they winna hear you?” “Then I’ll gang to some other place,” cried the quick little fellow. Alongside this desire for the ministry there sprang up an intense passion for learning. Even when very young he longed for the day when he would enter the University. On one occasion when very ill, he was heard to exclaim several times “O that God would spare me till I get on the red cloakie!” the red gown worn by the Aberdeen University students.
I cannot omit to notice here that Mr Duncan, Senior, married a second time, when the boy was about eight years of age. His wife, whose name was Sophia Sutherland, was, at the time of their union, an Episcopalian, but she afterwards became a staunch
Seceder. Step-mothers have often the reputation of being cold and unsympathetic towards the children who are not their own offspring, but it was far from being so in the present case. She stepped into the relationship in the most affectionate and motherly spirit and proved a noble substitute for the tender parent he had lost. Dr Duncan regarded his step-mother to the day of her death with the deepest “gratitude, affection, and reverence”. She was truly an excellent Christian woman, who loved him all the more when he became, in after years, a monument of divine grace and a humble follower of the Lamb. In his boyhood days she perceived that there was something uncommon about him, and that education was the life he was fitted for. His father insisted that he should become a shoemaker like himself, and put him on a stool in their little kitchen, which served as a workshop, but he was a failure in acquiring the art of shoemaking. “In his awkward fingers,” says his biographer, “everything went wrong; threads were badly waxed; soles were spoiled, and patches were botched,” until at length his tears and sobs aroused all the sympathies of his devoted step-mother, and she prevailed upon his father to take him off the working stool. As I have already hinted, his father was severe to a fault, as many parents were in those olden days — in our time the pendulum has largely swung to the opposite pole of indulgence — and the result was that the boyish resentment would sometimes show itself in almost amusing ways. Being displeased with his father’s severity on one occasion, when he was probably learning Latin at the Aberdeen Grammar School, he made his last will and testament in these brief but comprehensive and rhythmical terms: “omne matri, nihil patri” (to mother all, to father nothing).
The City of Aberdeen is famous for its Grammar School, an educational institution of great value, which has had a succession of distinguished masters from almost time immemorial. John Duncan entered this school in the year 1805-6 when he was nine years old. Here he spent five years, and had the reputation of being a clever scholar. His passion for languages then began to show itself, and also his passion for a subject at the time apparently beyond his years, Metaphysics. Long after he said to Professor Knight, “When at the Grammar School of Aberdeen I got hold of a volume of George Campbell (a Principal and Professor of Divinity at Aberdeen) in which he ridicules as lamentable folly the notion that to God there is no past, present or future — to Him all are one. I remember well how I abhorred George Campbell for that.” It must not be concluded, however, that the budding metaphysician and profound linguist was a mere dreamy bookworm and recluse. He was as full of fun and frolic as any other boy, and went for his holidays to an uncle’s farm
some miles north of Aberdeen, where he tended the cattle and played with a cousin during the vacation season.
At the age of 14 years he matriculated at the University for the first time, and so at last got on the red cloakie, which had been the object of his earnest longing even on a sick bed years before. One would have naturally expected that a youth of his uncommon ability and passionate devotion to books would have won a brilliant place in his University classes, but the result was not so. The irregularity in study and the absent-mindedness that characterised him all through life began to manifest themselves. He was probably reading far more than any student there in various departments of literature, but to stick to the methodical routine of class study was by no means his forte, and so he failed to take any place of distinction in his classes. Books, however, were his constant companions in all circumstances whether he was sitting at home or walking by the way, and though mental absent-mindedness was one side of his character, mental absorption was another side. Whatever subject he was interested in at the moment, it absorbed all his attention to the forgetfulness of everything else. On one occasion he was walking along on the south turnpike road of Aberdeen intensely reading a book. He became so absorbed in it that not till “his weary limbs” began to fail did he look up to find himself well-nigh at Stonehaven, a distance of nearly sixteen miles. He finished his course at the University, and took his degree of M.A. in the Spring of 1814.
By this time Mr Duncan had also become a student of divinity. It was customary for young men who were going forward to the ministry in connection with the Constitutional Associate Presbytery (Anti-Burgher) to begin their divinity studies between the third and fourth years of their Arts course. He was admitted as a divinity student by the Presbytery on 27th July, 1813, and attended a short session in divinity, beginning on the 1st of September. He was orthodox in his views at this period, but he was far from being spiritually prepared for the ministerial office. In 1816 he left the Secession and joined the Established Church of Scotland. He became a member in the congregation of the famous Dr James Kidd, minister of Gilcomston Chapel of Ease, and Professor of Oriental Languages in Marischal College, Aberdeen. Dr Kidd was a man of marked individuality and a powerful preacher of the gospel, whose wholesome influence was felt over all the city of Aberdeen, but his faithful ministry did not produce any beneficial impression at this stage on the mind of young Duncan, as he himself bore testimony years afterwards. In January, 1817, he presented himself for enrolment as a student of divinity in the Established Church of Scotland. His father, not too pleased already that he had left his own (the Secession)
Church, and knowing the spiritual unfitness of his son for the ministry, was nearly distracted, and went to Dr Brown, the Professor of Divinity, with “heavy complaints” against him, so as, if possible, to prevent his admission. But it would appear that the complaints were not of such a definite nature as could be handled to found proceedings upon in a concrete way, and so Dr Brown, after consultation with Dr Kidd, who had given a certificate in Duncan’s favour, could not refuse to enrol him. He was, therefore, enrolled in regular form.
But the worst has not yet been told. It was his own startling confession, uttered at different times to intimate friends during his future history, with expressions of deep sorrow, that he was an Atheist when he first entered the Divinity Hall of the Established Church. Referring in particular to the class of Dr Mearns, one of the professors, he said, “I was an Atheist when I entered his class.” Again, “I had a good upbringing, but I broke off from it. I had three years of dreary Atheism, and during the time I made a doctrinal atheist of a pupil of mine who died.” And still again he said, “I was much indebted to Dr Mearns . . . it was under him that I gave up Atheism.” To another friend (Mr Knight) he expressed himself to the effect that he was three years a Spinozist or Pantheist, and to others, still, that he fell into materialistic Atheism, denying the existence of God, of Angelic spirit and of human soul. Putting these testimonies together, he concluded that he fell for a short season, to begin with, into complete materialism, and that he afterwards rose to the slightly more elevated platform of Pantheism, but regarded it as no better than Atheism in effect. Having lost all definite belief in a personal Deity, and esteeming the all of the universe to be God and God to be all, without conscious existence, there is no doubt he was only a shade in intellectual belief above black and unmitigated Atheism, and he manifestly esteemed himself to be without any God, in the strict sense of the word, to look to, or exercise confidence in. One hopeful sign was that he was not happy in this condition. The years of Pantheistic Atheism were “dreary years”, years of darkness and misery.
Dr Mearns, the distinguished professor, was, by God’s blessing, his deliverer out of this horrible pit, although for years afterwards he was Christless. Dr Mearns’ impressive prayers and “severely rational and convincing” lectures combined to produce this favourable result. He came now to a definite belief in a personal God, transcendent above the universe, although immersed in it, and this intellectual conviction (which he never afterwards lost) appears to have been followed and backed by a ray of divine light, for he said in one of his accustomed talks to his friend, Miss Robertson, “When I was convinced that there was a God,
I danced on the Brig o’ Dee with delight, though I had a fear that He would damn me. Atheism would have been better than the certainty of damnation, but there was not that (certainly).” Pantheistic Atheism had only been a philosophy of desolation, darkness, and despair, and freedom from its awful bondage was a joyful deliverance. “But,” as his biographer says, “Mr Duncan’s joy at this stage was the joy of an intellectual rather than a spiritual repose, a joy chequered by the vivid consciousness that he neither was nor at that time was willing to be at peace with God . . . Hence he had the fear that God would damn him!” From this time we learn that for a period of nine years he was little troubled with theological difficulties, and concerned himself but little about his spiritual state. As to matters of faith, “he entrenched himself in a loose Sabellianism concerning the Trinity, untroubled by any questions about the Divinity of Christ, the Atonement and other great doctrines of the Gospel.”
The daily “round of teaching, reading, deep thinking, company and attendance during the session at the Divinity Hall made up his life now for long years.” And yet this period was not unfruitful — very far from it. In fact, it was during those years that he acquired a large measure of that vast knowledge which he afterwards displayed of the classical and oriental languages, of the literature of philosophy and theology, and of the poetry, history, and general literature of his own country. He became known among his fellow-students as one distinguished for his acquirements in classical literature. During one of the sessions he was prizeman for a Latin essay, and the Professor said that his was the only essay that was thought out in the language in which it was written. He also attached himself to some of the Highland students that he might acquire some knowledge of Gaelic, and this he actually attained.
Dr Duncan came to the close of his divinity course in 1821, but for four years thereafter he hesitated to take license, unable as he then was honestly to subscribe the Westminster Confession of Faith. At last, in 1825, he presented himself for license, not because he had changed his views of subscription to articles of faith, regarding them now only as peace articles, in subscribing which licentiates only pledge themselves not to preach against them. In looking back upon this step he always spoke of it with abhorrence and grief. To Miss Robertson he said, less than a year before he died, “I took license in unbelief, in ungodliness and in doctrinal unbelief and heresy.” “How did they let you pass?” she asked. “Because I was a hypocrite,” was his reply, “not willingly, for I kept back for long; but at last people were upon me, and out of very shame I acted the hypocrite; I did not choose to tell others why I was not taking license.” The words
contain a solemn message, I fear, to many who are entering the office of the ministry in the several Churches of today. He was licensed by the Presbytery to preach the gospel on the 24th of June, 1825, and his first sermon was preached in the West Church, Aberdeen, from 1 John iii, i — “Behold what manner of love the father hath bestowed upon us that we should be called the sons of God”. He called it in later years a tremendously bad sermon — a sermon of the most artful theology that perhaps ever was spoken, explaining away every evangelical doctrine and phrase. Dr Brown, who was present, reports that “apart from its vital defects, there was a calm, contemplative, high, half-poetic, half-mystic strain about it, which had a most fascinating effect upon the hearer; accordingly all was still attention, and a sort of wonder pervaded the audience.”
But I must hasten on to notice the great change which took place in the character and life of this remarkable man. The instrument in the hand of God of that change was Dr Césor Malan, of Geneva, an eminent preacher of the everlasting gospel. Malan, who was persecuted in Geneva for his faithful proclamation of the evangelical faith, paid his first visit to England and Scotland in the year 1822. He was gladly welcomed by all who loved the true gospel. In 1826 he came to this country for the first time as an expressed “missionary character”, and it was while on this tour that he visited Aberdeen, and was the guest of a brother of Dr Brown (Dr Duncan’s biographer). Brown, who himself had but recently entered into gospel light and liberty, was intensely desirous to get Mr Duncan to meet Malan with a view to spiritual benefit, and had two days beforehand long and intensely interesting conversations with Dr Duncan on his soul’s case, which undoubtedly prepared the way for his listening to Malan. Mr Duncan came to the house of Dr Brown’s brother, among other guests, and had a long private conversation with Malan, who plied him with the text, “Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God”. It is impossible for me to give the details of this striking interview, but when Mr Duncan happened to quote a text in the course of the conversation, Dr Malan started forward and said, “See! you have the Word of God in your mouth,” to which Mr Duncan gave the memorable reply, “And may He not utterly take it out of my mouth.” Mr Duncan said in later days that Malan’s utterance “passed through him like a shock of electricity — the great thought that God meant man to know His mind; God — His word — in my very mouth.” It was, I believe, he added, “the seed of perhaps all I have, if I have anything, to this hour.” The proud scholar was completely changed, and became as a little child at the feet of Jesus. As he sat down to study a day or two after he “became
suddenly (according to his own words) the passive recipient of all the truths he had heard and been taught from childhood. I sat there wondering for hours, and they came and preached themselves to me.” And night after night — God was now speaking home to his mind and heart the whole plan of salvation — he laid himself down to rest with the child’s prayer on his lips, as the genuine outflow of his heart :—
“This night when I lie down to sleep,
I give my soul to Christ to keep;
If I should die before I wake,
I pray the Lord my soul to take.”
Dr Duncan’s conversion — by the way like the Apostle Paul’s and the great John Calvin’s — was a sudden one, but it was none the less genuine on that account. Its suddenness and its thoroughness gave a vigorous proof of the almighty, wonderworking power of God, who can turn in a single moment the shadow of death into the morning. He saw revealed truth in a new light, and he began to walk with a tender conscience in the fear of God. The very temptation to daily sin was for the time being gone, and he contended for the truth in the person of Christ as God manifest in the flesh with an earnestness and zeal born of a new vision of the glory of God as revealed in His Son, treading with intense vehemence on his former views, which were practically Socinian and Unitarian. His reverence now for the word of God, with all his natural suspicion of temperament, and keen critical powers, was profound in the extreme. Dr Moody Stuart bears testimony: “More than any man I ever knew, he trusted every word, reverenced every word, and loved every word in the book of God.” His preaching at this time took its colour from the teaching of his spiritual father, Dr Malan. He insisted on an immediate belief in the Lord Jesus Christ as a personal Redeemer and Saviour and without defining too particularly the nature of saving faith as the gift of God, he assured his hearers of their possession of acceptance with God and eternal life, if they but believed. He took a high line on the subject of the assurance and joy of faith, and did not bring out sufficiently the place and necessity of the Holy Spirit’s work. Still it was the time of his “first love”, and while his preaching had its defects, not slight, yet coming as it did from one who was really anointed with the Spirit, it had its excellencies and its power. It may be mentioned here, by the way, that although the spiritual change in Mr Duncan was complete and manifest, his special peculiarities of character remained. His absentmindedness continued as a permanent feature
An amusing illustration of it is often repeated. He was walking to Maryculter, seven miles from Aberdeen, on a Sacramental Fast Day, to preach, and when he had gone a considerable way
he drew out his snuff-box to take a pinch. The wind being in his face, he turned about to perform the operation; but when he accomplished this he did not turn round again; he moved on in the direction of Aberdeen, from which he had come, until eventually he was brought to his senses by the enquiry of a man who was going to the church at Maryculter, and who recognised him as the expected preacher for the day.
(to be continued)